Thanks for sharing the wonderful shots from m240. Any benefit from using wider angle lense like 24mm > and now with the LV, no need to mount those cumbersome attachment? How's framing these wide angle shots like?
btw, does LV means equiv to mirrorless mode? i.e. reduced shutter movement, thus reduce handshake risk?
thanks bro.
Shutter movement is increased, as the camera has to close the shutter, then open and close again to take the shot. This results in shutter lag. Btw it's quite good for wide angles, 100% framing like an SLR. But there is some lag in the EVF of course, unlike using an optical VF.
M240 improves the usability of digital rangefinder cameras, LV turns it into a mirror less camera. However the manual focus, no stability aid and shutter lag makes it no match against top end DSLRs offered by Nikon and Cannon.
If taking sports and wildlife shots are not your top priority and you want superior optics, Leica M can offer users a one system solution that offers best optics money can buy and a compact digital camera that offers some respect.
M240 improves the usability of digital rangefinder cameras, LV turns it into a mirror less camera. However the manual focus, no stability aid and shutter lag makes it no match against top end DSLRs offered by Nikon and Cannon.
If taking sports and wildlife shots are not your top priority and you want superior optics, Leica M can offer users a one system solution that offers best optics money can buy and a compact digital camera that offers some respect.
Used to shoot the M9-P.... no one respect you for it...
NO i don't. See post prior....... " Leica M can offer users a one system solution that offers best optics money can buy and a compact digital camera that offers some respect. "