Chew Siow Ming
New Member
+evenstar said:not very good, but my attempts few months ago..
![]()
![]()
![]()
very nice moon... care to share how to take pic of moon plsssse. can a 80-200mm handle ?
not in urban area i guessed.
+evenstar said:not very good, but my attempts few months ago..
![]()
![]()
![]()
djork said:
cerebrus said:Is effective focal length 355mm (Takahashi 60mm) or more due to the camera?
Impressive shot! :thumbsup:
you'll need a 2x IMO..Chew Siow Ming said:very nice moon... care to share how to take pic of moon plsssse. can a 80-200mm handle ?
not in urban area i guessed.
Francis247 said:Interesting link. Don't mind if I update my link list. Thank you very much.
Jaycelim said:Sure, share it with everyone![]()
djork said:Hi cerebrus, i remember calculating once for my film camera (forgot the formula already), the effective focal length is about 800 to 1000mm.
so now with the 1.6x crop it should be between 1280 to 1600mm
It's not the telescope, it's the image processing software call RegiStax... It'll make your Moon images look very details and sharp... just don't over do it.Jaycelim said:My shot on 3 Sep 06... can't compare to those using telescope :cry:
I like the first shot, with the curved terminator. :thumbsup:weixing said:Hi,
It's not the telescope, it's the image processing software call RegiStax... It'll make your Moon images look very details and sharp... just don't over do it.Try it, it's free anyway.
Have a nice day.
Yes... it's a telescope and 1000mm focal length, but with a non-hack Canon 300D (no mirror lock-up), it basically impossible to get a image so sharp and with so many details without the help of image processing software... the magic of digital imaging and image processing...cerebrus said:I like the first shot, with the curved terminator. :thumbsup:
Err.... is not a 120mm F8.3 Achromatic Refractor a telescope? Think the normal focal length must be 1000mm or more. :sweat:
ortega said:some very nice moon shots in this tread
I'll have to try different phases, but here is my attempt to share
![]()
weixing said:Yes... it's a telescope and 1000mm focal length, but with a non-hack Canon 300D (no mirror lock-up), it basically impossible to get a image so sharp and with so many details without the help of image processing software... the magic of digital imaging and image processing...
Have a nice day.
Ooops, my bad. I read it as 30D. :bsmilie:weixing said:Yes... it's a telescope and 1000mm focal length, but with a non-hack Canon 300D (no mirror lock-up), it basically impossible to get a image so sharp and with so many details without the help of image processing software... the magic of digital imaging and image processing...
Have a nice day.