Tang Shooters XLVI: TCSS Thread...


Status
Not open for further replies.
Gd evening everyone, :)

hmm.. thinking of buying UWA lens... any recommendation ?

I want the lens to be use in FX and DX body lei and when using in FX body it will not penalty the pixels size.

Correct me if I am wrong, Tamron and Tokina UWA are DX lens right...how about sigma 10-20 ?

Sigma one is FX..but i heard Sigma got quite a number with focussing issues..so better test the lense properly before buying..check with KT if u r not sure..so far i think he's producing pretty sharp images from his UWA...if got cash, just go straight for 14-24..no need to think liao..:devil:

10-20 is DX lens bro. 12-24 is FX. But if you have the budget, get the 14-24. No regrets, I assure u:thumbsup:
 

Tonite's moon at 0.96 Fraction, Wed will be full moon.

2937221135_5b7eeb222a.jpg
 

Sigma 10-20 is DX so on full frame only usable from 15mm onwards if mount on FF. Only the Sigma 12-24 is FX compatible.

I have been using 10-20 for 1.5 years... my fav lens of all time. Dun think will be giving it up unless I go FF. But not an easy lens to start off coz distortion at 10-14mm are bad but work it nicely and u can get superb shots from it…One lens that I wont give up…

10-20 is DX lens bro. 12-24 is FX. But if you have the budget, get the 14-24. No regrets, I assure u:thumbsup:

ok guys thanks for the input.... I will think it seriously...
 

fwah another buttie considering uwa :think:
 

10-20 is DX lens bro. 12-24 is FX. But if you have the budget, get the 14-24. No regrets, I assure u:thumbsup:

ok guys thanks for the input.... I will think it seriously...

Buttie...Nikon 12-24 ish DX...Sigma 12-24 ish DG (=FX)...don't get confused...

When in doubt, hootz NIkon 14-24, consperm FX rens...:thumbsup:
 

OOU! 12-24 f/2.8?

I remember seeing a client's 12-24. It was HUGE! Beri SEKSI!!! :lovegrin:
 

cs v slow again... predict going to down soon :bsmilie:
 

Hmm ... then if nex round like 30 of us go and buy, then another 30 of each of our friends go and buy, that's like 930 people go and buy, then kenar fly aeroplane again ... hmm ... $837 liddat fly liao.

I wonder first round how many hundreds of lollars wasted oredi (for those who don't usually buy lor).

I was one of the person who usually don't buy and wasted my 80 cents. :( :cry:
 

Dun stressed... tonite i treat u ice cream... wahaha... :devil:



A bit on the cheeks i spotted... 2 or 3 patches... hee... no worries... i ish can gib u smoothening techniques... but wanna tok abt good DI must ask gabin buttie.. :heart:

hokays, i like to being smoothen... sho relaxed hweeling....
 

Gd evening everyone, :)

hmm.. thinking of buying UWA lens... any recommendation ?

I want the lens to be use in FX and DX body lei and when using in FX body it will not penalty the pixels size.

Correct me if I am wrong, Tamron and Tokina UWA are DX lens right...how about sigma 10-20 ?

Yup, what Tamron, Tokina have is DX for UWA. Only Sigma have both DX n FX lens. Sigma 10-20 is DX lens n 12-24 is FX lens.

If u r looking for DX, then either Sigma 10-20 or Tokina 11-16. Tokina has a constant f2.8 compare to Sigma. Best is Nikon 12-24 DX lens.

For FX lens, only Sigma has 12-24 UWA other than Nikon's 14-24. Sigma 12-24 biggest problem is the CA. Very obvious @ f4.5 to f11+-. In terms of focus n performance, so far so good. Sigma lens also prone to fungus.

If got extra bullet, go for Nikon 14-24 f2.8 constant. Alot better compare to Sigma in terms of build n quality. Only downside is the barrel distortion. Sigma handles this way better than Nikon.
 

Jimmy, 1 more for u........ b4 i go sleep.

2937285024_9db5955ec1.jpg
 

Good morning butties... Headed to school now. :cry:


Oh, good morning John! :)
 

BBB To9

7pm
Funan (J316)

BBButties:
1. Mapper48
2. Coolsigg
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top