jeff49er said:Just my humble opinion, ESPN should pack up and go.
Very sadly we are a small nation and that means we can never enjoy what other mass market can. :cry:
But if ESPN quits, we won't have any more "Buy Buy Buy" shoutings.
:devil:
jeff49er said:Just my humble opinion, ESPN should pack up and go.
Very sadly we are a small nation and that means we can never enjoy what other mass market can. :cry:
togu said:But if ESPN quits, we won't have any more "Buy Buy Buy" shoutings.
:devil:
togu said:But if ESPN quits, we won't have any more "Buy Buy Buy" shoutings.
:devil:
glennyong said:yah... who wants and dares to fight with Singtel and Starhub now... haha.. u know why ? because DPM Lee's wife is the major shareholder of Singtel and Starhub... she holds the the 2nd largest share of Singtel besides Lee Hsien Yang... and i think she holds 75% of Starhub's shares ? :dunno:
simple reason why theres no competitor for Starhub in cable tv ?
because everyones afraid of the lady at the top of the hill.... and if she gets angry.... the bombs start flying and pricings start floating to the sky.. and we will pay more and lose more to her..
in the end.. we are the losing end.....
reachme2003 said:i wish to correct your stt. PM Lee H L's wife, Mdm Ho Ching is not a major shareholder of Singtel and Starhub. It is one or more of the govt related cos like Temasek Holdings, ST Telemedia, etc.
epiphany said:Hmm.. You're right in saying that Mdm Ho Ching isn't a major shareholder of Singtel and Starhub per se However, as you mentioned, Temasek Holdings owns most of Singtel/Starhub and Mdm Ho Ching happens to be the Executive Director and CEO
And I unsubscribed from the sports channel as well.. Not really worth the money.
For soccer afficionados, perhaps. But definitely not for those aren't (it sucks!)!Phildate said:We're getting a great deal, it's just that we've been used to getting a REALLY great deal!!
AdamGoi said:Come on people ... let's keep politics out of this; to begin with the price hike has nothing to do with it! (For those who have been following the development should know what are the real reasons)
For me, bo bian lor ... I can't without football ...
but then again, it's also about standard of livingPhildate said:I just got my letter from Starhub and yes, it does seem a bit of a price hike.
Luckily, my parents from UK are visiting and they told me that they pay around $90 a month for Sky Digital and then some matches cost 5 pounds (15 dollars) pay per view. That sort of puts it into perspective.
We're getting a great deal, it's just that we've been used to getting a REALLY great deal!!
Aton said:I'm paying the increment for soccer matches which i do not watch.
Not enuf snooker program, definitely cancel sports channel.
reachme2003 said:You are correct that Mdm Ho Ching is an executive employee of Temasek. Despite that, she still does not own a single share in Temasek.
Anyway, if i have to choose between being an employee and a shareholder, i prefer the latter.
bwilly said:are you sure??
for high position directors, they are always given some form of shares as incentive.
with more option to purchase at lower than market price.
with shares, the higher management will work harder. (better profit, higher share price)
starhub will cover more than enuff with all the cancelling.
they should anticipated and compute - certain percentage of cancelling with
the number of no choice subscriber (pub owners/hardcore EPL viewers).
Put it in this way scenario.
ESPN contract - $4million
eg. 100,000 subscriber - $8
Profit $4million
new contract
ESPN contract - $8million
80,000 subscriber - $15
Profit $4million
So for those who cancelled, they already budgeted. those pubs who want beer/liquor business, won't consider cancelling.