Share some MF photos ...

[bearxiangz]

very vivid colours clubgrit!:thumbsup:

 

[clubgrit]

Thanks, bearxiangz. More info - the red background was indeed bright red in color, plus it was a bright late morning, and a gold reflector was used as well. The red is more accurate on Adobe RGB than sRGB, though, but internet only uses sRGB.

The colours on the ground are paint from a furniture maker ...




.

 

[Ansel]

Nice cross-processing effect! Good shot!

 

[Ansel]

Some old shots, done on Seagull 4B-1 , scanned from prints

Prints always seem to produce better scans than negs or slides do. Nice shots!

 

[noelleong]

Nice, is that cross-processed ? The wild hair matches the edgy color

.

Clubgrit and Ansel,

Digitally cross processed I know nothing about film. Just beginning to use it. He he

 

[noelleong]

Nice cross-processing effect! Good shot!

Digital Cross Processing.:bsmilie: How are you Ansel? Thanks for the LF experience but never got to shoot with it:bsmilie:

 

[Ansel]

Digital Cross Processing.:bsmilie: How are you Ansel? Thanks for the LF experience but never got to shoot with it:bsmilie:

One day we can try again, really shoot with it...if you are still insterested.

 

[nightwolf75]

something i did years ago... before kids came along. :bsmilie:

done with my ex-Kiev 88CM on the volnar 80mm/f2.8 on fujiPROH 400 film. will be re-buying the kiev soon. still have a love-interest in this hasselbladski... ;p

 

[boochap]

something i did years ago... before kids came along. :bsmilie:


done with my ex-Kiev 88CM on the volnar 80mm/f2.8 on fujiPROH 400 film. will be re-buying the kiev soon. still have a love-interest in this hasselbladski... ;p

very nice..!

 

[clubgrit]

Well, noel, looks good. Film cross-process can be done by Ruby Photo, but it can be unpredictable and lots of colors casts, but vivid. Digital is easier to control though

One more night shot before a break ...

Rolleiflex 2.8F, 1/30 ,f/2.8, Tri-X, subtly tinted. Love the absence
of any mirror slap on the Rolleiflexes/Cord.

.

 

[clubgrit]

I agree on that, but more on the tone, where traditional prints really bring it out. These pics are good examples as the subjects are full of hard edges and surfaces, good light, and are simple, easy on the eyes.

Prints always seem to produce better scans than negs or slides do.

 

[noelleong]

Well, noel, looks good. Film cross-process can be done by Ruby Photo, but it can be unpredictable and lots of colors casts, but vivid. Digital is easier to control though

One more night shot before a break ...

Rolleiflex 2.8F, 1/30 ,f/2.8, Tri-X, subtly tinted. Love the absence
of any mirror slap on the Rolleiflexes/Cord.

.

Thanks for the infor. And nice capture of the moment. :thumbsup: I do agree that Hassy mirror flap is loud.:angry:

 

[noelleong]

I agree on that, but more on the tone, where traditional prints really bring it out. These pics are good examples as the subjects are full of hard edges and surfaces, good light, and are simple, easy on the eyes.

Can anyone bring some old/new traditional prints? I would love to see.:thumbsup::thumbsup:

 

[jonathan_wong]

Shoot. my dad left behind a whole metal box of B&W negatives..... wonder how to arrange them. Mostly China town in the 60s. Families, etc :dunno:

 

[boochap]

Hasselblad 503cw.

..

 

[boochap]

Same location, with wide angle.. Hasselblad 503cw, CF50mm.


..

 

[chiif]

Same location, with wide angle.. Hasselblad 503cw, CF50mm.


..

Beautiful!

Now you need to show us a version with a SWC 38mm :bsmilie:

 

[chiif]

Fujifilm GA645. Amazing PnS medium format camera. So easy to use and carry around. I'm starting to miss it already... ;p

 

[nightwolf75]

Hasselblad 503cw.

..

hmm.. i like this one better than the wide version.

 

[boochap]

Beautiful!

Now you need to show us a version with a SWC 38mm :bsmilie:

alamak, dun hv 38mm lehh... xpan can or not? next time i go try again..