jackwolf
Senior Member
What I hope for was a swivel screen instead of a tilt screen
Looking at the rumour pictures, it will not be swivel. no hinge at the side. most like a tilt screen again.
OMG! Look at the EM-1 aka the now official E-M1 Thread
- Thread starter hammeryou
- Start date
Looking at the rumour pictures, it will not be swivel. no hinge at the side. most like a tilt screen again.
http://petapixel.com/2013/09/06/huge-set-olympus-om-d-e-m1-photos-make-way-online/
eager to get my hands on e-m1+12/40
eager to get my hands on e-m1+12/40
E-M1 MkII.........X?
microcosm
Senior Member
Quite likely. They are going the same direction as the other camera makers it seems.
Alphonse
Senior Member
This may me wonder their direction... ... predicting:
E-M1 series pro range (using the same design with grip) that will have the best technology available
E-M5 series stylist range (using the same design without grip other colour range, silver, brown, black etc) that will have the 2nd best technology available
E-M3 series... ... hmmmm
ageha
Senior Member
Fortunately
wackykid
New Member
dunno is thie EM-1 really a good thing or not... it's kinda funny that mirrorless camera makers are trying to make their cameras bigger... more $$$ and more "pro".... but DSLR makers are trying to make their entry level DSLRs smaller... lighter and cheaper... 
regards,
wacky
regards,
wacky
Last edited:
ageha
Senior Member
It should be like that, it makes sense.dunno is thie EM-1 really a good thing or not... it's kinda funny that mirrorless camera makers are trying to make their cameras bigger... more $$$ and more "pro".... but DSLR makers are trying to make their entry level DSLRs smaller... lighter and cheaper...
regards,
wacky
milez
New Member
dunno is thie EM-1 really a good thing or not... it's kinda funny that mirrorless camera makers are trying to make their cameras bigger... more $$$ and more "pro".... but DSLR makers are trying to make their entry level DSLRs smaller... lighter and cheaper...
regards,
wacky
Base on market perception that big DLSR is better.... it made sense for Olympus to follow the crowd.
But on design language, i think they have lost their way a little just to please the crowd. The zenith of their design to me is the E-P5.
wackykid
New Member
but isn't ironic... that the whole reason why the mirrorless camp started and gained traction is because of the prospect of having a smaller body that is as capable as DSLRs in terms of IQ... but instead of improving the IQ in the same smaller body... we are targetting "pro" users who wants a bigger camera...?
regards,
wacky
ageha
Senior Member
Not really. They need to target them as well obviously with their mirror-less bodies coz that's all they have and they also want a piece of that cake.
http://blog.mingthein.com/2013/09/10/olympus-om-d-e-m1-review-1/
The 2013 Olympus OM-D E-M1 review, part one: the camera
The 2013 Olympus OM-D E-M1 review, part one: the camera
ricleo
Senior Member
I got this message, looks like the review was removed, perhaps posted too early?
Not Found, Error 404
The page you are looking for no longer exists. Perhaps you can return back to the site's homepage and see if you can find what you are looking for. Or, you can try finding it with the information below.
ageha
Senior Member
Yep... But I read it already this morning.
so are the specs as same as the rumors?
ageha
Senior Member
alamak
Member
They're just casting a wider net. For me this is to satisfy the pros and those with 43 glasses.
Hope the tech trickles down to the entry em, ep and epl series, less the high price.
