Thanks for all the suggestions. I don't mind losing the 17-23mm width. Just checked the price for Tamron 17-50mm on the price guide. It is almost half the price of the both canon lens. But how does this lens fair as compared to the 17-55mm?
Tucksoon said:My bad. Haha. I'm also learning. I see saDdyJ86's comment I also blur liao hehe.
Just to clear things up, aperture values changes when you zoom with kit lens 18-55mm. Zoom lens like the popular 17-55mm with constant aperture f/2.8 can fix aperture value at 2.8. Correct me if I'm wrong again. Getting late![]()
Oh dear. Have you read the manual? I think you did not right? Haha. Anyway to answer your last question, you can't change the aperture as the kit lens has variable aperture. You can only fix the aperture value if you are using a prime lens. No offence but you really need to read the manual. If you hate reading, why not watch these YouTube videos from this YouTuber Derek to learn the basics before you pull your hair again?![]()
Hmm.. Just to make things clearer, there are zoom lenses with fixed aperture as well..
guess you knew it.. but the way you phrase it might mislead saDdyJ86..
![]()
My bad. Haha. I'm also learning. I see saDdyJ86's comment I also blur liao hehe.
Just to clear things up, aperture values changes when you zoom with kit lens 18-55mm. Zoom lens like the popular 17-55mm with constant aperture f/2.8 can fix aperture value at 2.8. Correct me if I'm wrong again. Getting late![]()
claudius said:Thanks for all the suggestions. I don't mind losing the 17-23mm width. Just checked the price for Tamron 17-50mm on the price guide. It is almost half the price of the both canon lens. But how does this lens fair as compared to the 17-55mm?
Tamron haunts in lowlight. Its a hit n miss thing
Tamron 17-50 is a good affordable alternative to the 17-55, except for the issue above mentioned by maldito. the 17-55 adds USM and IS, but it may not be worth the extra cost if you are on a tight budget. i have one complaint about the 17-55, though. the zoom ring is not very smooth when zooming during video.It's one of best bang for buck lens. The 17-55mm is definitely the faster, quieter and sharper lens but the Tamron is not far off. Review: http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/2...ii-ld-aspherical-if-canon-test-report--review
i would choose Tamron 17-50 over this for the constant aperture. easier to shoot manual at f/2.8. it is hard to shoot manual with variable aperture lens. for the extra 20mm of range, can consider the very affordable EF-S 55-250 as a future purchase.If u want cheap. Tarmon 28-70. I think is ard 600+
Tamron haunts in lowlight. Its a hit n miss thing
rvf79 said:what i heard from my friend is it noisy...
dat y i am thinking of 70-200
Tucksoon said:Bro u tried/rented the 70-200mm f/2.8 before? 1.5kg sia![]()
rvf79 said:Haven't try. When I have the money n need to use, then will get la... Later try Liao then I like, then gana BBB them how?
Lol
Tucksoon said:No lah. I rented before. 1.5kg is no joke![]()
Which one u rent? How much?
saDdyJ86 said:hi guys, i was wondering 550D can shoot panorama shot? thanks.
oic. but if i wanna shoot panorama shot how shall i do abt it ah? currently i only have 18-135mm lens.![]()
saDdyJ86 said:oic. but if i wanna shoot panorama shot how shall i do abt it ah? currently i only have 18-135mm lens.![]()
saDdyJ86 said:oic. but if i wanna shoot panorama shot how shall i do abt it ah? currently i only have 18-135mm lens.![]()