Nikkornos
Senior Member
Hi, Nikkornos
May I know something on F100 is quite similar design as F6 today.
But the price is look like no value to have the F100.
All of them still prefer on F2 and above..
Do you have any experience on this?
Thanks your advise.
F100 is still a 90s camera, film based. It is a scaled down F5 design I think, and came out well before F6.
Value is in the eyes of the beholder.
Like market shares, all shares are the same. It is those shares that are traded heavily (because of hype, play, or whatever big $$$ guy push up) that has value, right? You buy SIA share, how much ups and down can it offer you?
Nikon 3D matrix metering is great for flash and slides photography. The old F90x to F801 are still accurate until today.
If you do not want to be burdened by F5's 8 frames/second and only need 4 or 5 frames/second, the F100 is great.
I nearly obtained a F80, until I learned that AIS camera does not have metering coupling with the F80. So Adios.
The F601 still works well for me.
If you like weather proofing, CHEAP (yeah F90x, F801s all only 100 dollars now :sticktong ) F100, why not.
You can see my emphasis are still prime Nikkor AIS and AFD lenses, some 3rd party gems.
So, AIS, non AI compatibility, use of AFD are important for me.
The F601, F801s, F90x are still my main camera bodies. The F501 with a light lens is my so called 'RF' kit.
I need AF because of age now. I see many posted MF or RF pictures, all out of focus, a clear sign of lack of training or discipline.
If cannot shoot well focused pictures, might as well shoot Holga, right?
F2 is hyped up value. Its heavy, and for me the Nikkormat FT3 is good enough.
Last edited: