snowspeeder
Senior Member
That's cool...in case one card screws up.
It's Official - D300, D3 and Lenses etc
- Thread starter arpinkor
- Start date
- Status
That's cool...in case one card screws up.
longkangman
Senior Member
Write to both CF card is better than mirror one CF with another. :dunno:
ortega
Moderator
not sure how it is done but one card is a back up of the other
longkangman
Senior Member
if in the case of backup then one corrupted image will be reflected on the 2nd CF as well. :dunno:
Let not worry.
Let not worry.
They have a set each?
longkangman
Senior Member
but if img is copy from 1st CF card and img(corrupt) is bad the img is then copy to the 2nd img.
LL loh.
longkangman
Senior Member
photographique
Senior Member
http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1187901361.html
".......The D3 didn't just surpass the 1D Mark III, it far surpassed it. (in terms of ISO noise)"
".......The D3 didn't just surpass the 1D Mark III, it far surpassed it. (in terms of ISO noise)"
longkangman
Senior Member
Frankly, i doubt so, esp on "far surpassed". It may not be as significant as Canon 5D vs Nikon D2x on noise. However, I hope I am wrong!:think:
photographique
Senior Member
According to article, the show had comparisons of photos from both cameras.
"The D3's high ISO is really impressive I'll remain at least somewhat skeptical until we can get a D3 back in the lab and test it under controlled conditions, but Nikon showed some incredibly impressive prints at the event. They had enlargements that must have been 30x45 inches or more in size, comparing identical shots taken with the D3 and Canon EOS-1D Mark III at ISO 3,200 and 6,400."
:think:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjG--kWz-L0
Video found in You Tube. It's in Japanese. But seems like shots taken at ISO6400 exhibit "very little" noise...
Video found in You Tube. It's in Japanese. But seems like shots taken at ISO6400 exhibit "very little" noise...
blurrblurr
Senior Member
I dun understand what he is saying but the sound of the flipping mirror is :bigeyes:
geraldkhoo
Senior Member
Are you asking about the phrase -> "very little" noise?
Taken from a weblog.
「高感度ノイズに関しては、ニコンは６４００までを常用範囲と位置づけているといったことをはなしているようで、実際に６４００の画質は驚異的な低ノイズだったのだとか。直接の比較でなく印象としてはＤ２Ｈの８００とＤ３の６４００が同程度とか。このあたり実際にみてみないとわかりませんが、ニコンの今までのデジタル一眼レフのノイズレベルとはかなり世代の違ったものとなっているようすです」
Bascially the noise is low even at 6400. the first impression wou;d be that the D3`s 6400 is about the same level at the D2H at ISO 800. Which is damn useable by my book.
「高感度ノイズに関しては、ニコンは６４００までを常用範囲と位置づけているといったことをはなしているようで、実際に６４００の画質は驚異的な低ノイズだったのだとか。直接の比較でなく印象としてはＤ２Ｈの８００とＤ３の６４００が同程度とか。このあたり実際にみてみないとわかりませんが、ニコンの今までのデジタル一眼レフのノイズレベルとはかなり世代の違ったものとなっているようすです」
Bascially the noise is low even at 6400. the first impression wou;d be that the D3`s 6400 is about the same level at the D2H at ISO 800. Which is damn useable by my book.
blurrblurr
Senior Member
I mean I dun understand Japanese. All I know is he is try to show us the noise level. Actually I cannot see the picture clearly and dun think is noise photo can be seen from 3" LCD right? But Personally believe that nikon did their homework to control the noise level.
- Status
