shengliang1981
New Member
It's more about the DOF/bokeh than the amount of light for me, actually. I'm a big fan of primes so I cannot accept anything > f2.8 :bsmilie:
If I'm not wrong...the price of the 50mm f2 can also cut me, right?
Yes, the f2 + macro in the LX3 is pretty good. However a PnS is still a PnS, there are still certain things that a DSLR will do better, imo. I actually think the LX3 is so perfect in what it does (sharpness etc etc) that I don't feel like I'm taking a photo. I'm just pressing a button :bsmilie:
Tomcat is right, the E-P1 definitely have better control at F2.8 for shallow DOF despite that LX3 is using a F2.0 lens due to the larger sensor. To get a FOV of 24mm using the LX3, the actual focal length of the lens is 5.1mm. For equivalent FOV of 24mm using E-P1, the focal length is 12mm, which gives a more shallow DOF even at F2.8.