Ding Shan Ben
New Member
just curious, why you want 2 cameras?
Ding Shan Ben said:just curious, why you want 2 cameras?
espn said:You shouldn't think so much :nono:
Just BUY BUY BUY!!!!
Gymrat76 said:Two cameras? If you mean why do I want to shoot film when I'm already shooting digital, well, I just want to get into shooting slides for a change.
Gymrat76 said:Hehe, no problem Ansel.
Anyone else got any opinions on the F80 vs. F100 vs. F5?
I must say that I've heard a lot of good things about the F5's matrix metering, so I'm sorely tempted to go for that, but I'm not sure if it'll be too overkill for what I shoot. I don't need the 8fps since I don't shoot sports or fast action (besides, slide film is expensive :sweat: ).
How is the battery life/consumption of the F5 vs the F100. How many shots/rolls on average before you need to recharge batteries?
F5user said:Ok la... let me give u a rough estimate...
on a set of 08 x energizer 2300 Nimah batts, I manage to squeeze out about 30 - 38 rolls of film, mostly based on the CL setting, and normal AF usage. But do bear in mind that i shoot at colder temperatures. (still stuck in ang moh land.)
Well, there's never an "overkill" of a good thing, i believe.
Slide film is indeed expensive yes... but since you're starting out within the world of chromes, cost shouldn't be an issue. Just avoid the trigger-happiness bred by the usage of your dslr, compose your shots better, take note of the ambient lighting situations, and you'll be fine.
Gymrat76 said:Oh, one more thing: given the cost of film and the shutter life of pro bodies like the F5 (which should be in the tens of thousands, right?) is it safe to say that I wouldn't have to worry all that much about the shutter count when buying a 2nd hand F5? What else should I look out for? Thanks![]()
F5user said:Ok about shutter life, my first body (f5) which i've retired onto the shelf, has effectively seen 970 000 shots. Of course i sent it in regularly for servicing, but so far (touch wood) it's still operating as per factory specifications.
Gymrat76 said:Hi Nikonians,
I'm in need of some advice on which film body to buy. I'm currently using the D70, but would like to venture into shooting film, so I need some advice on which film body would best complement my existing lenses. I need a body that is on which I can use my G lenses (no aperture ring), as well as VR. Preferably something with CAM1300, and is able to use a motor drive/vertical grip. I've been considering a second hand F100 or F5, and have been told that since the prices of these two are quite similar, I shoud just spring and get an F5. Some advice from film shooters would be great. Thanks![]()
Kimura_papaya said:hi...just wish to advice u ...for film..f80D version is more than good enuff...spending on f100 would end up a waste. f80 itself has a lot of good feature even metering syste...in fact some very senior and skilful photographer..still using f80D body..it fit in G, D, VR lens..except DX lens...so u dont worry.
unless u have loads of $$ resource...then u may consider F5. F6 is too expensive to adventure..not worth.
i find that film to me still very practical to shoot...though is slightly expensive.
Gymrat76 said:.... I'm a bit doubtful after reading about all the problems with difficult-to-remember custom settings on the cams. Will check out more on the F80, thanks kimura.
What is the learning curve like for the F100 and F5? I'm talking strictly about getting familiar with the camera and its features, how to access menus etc. How long did it take you before you were familiar with using the cam comfortably?
szekiat said:The F4 has been around for ages now and nikon only stopped support last summer. That should give you an indication. I sent my F3 in 2yrs ago and they had all the parts needed and thats a 1983 camera. I'd spring for an F5 simply because of the tremendously faster AF. Even though they both use the same cam module, the F5 has a drive motor with a ton more torque. To use a simple illustration, the 80-200AFD on an F5 will feel almost as fast as the 80-200AFS and way faster than say the sigma HSM. Also, the color matrix metering makes a ton of a difference. I've been saved countless no. of times by it when i shoot a white background without compensating. The meter actually doesn't require much compensation.
Look carefully on the bay and you can find one with the NiCd batt pack. That is essential since the F5 drinks batteries. All in all, with the minute price diff, i'd sooner get a crapped up F5 than a brand new F100
szekiat said:A lot of users have argued that the F100 removable grip is an advantage. Just thought i'd add my 2c worth on it though. I've used a d100, f100, Eos 1N, 1V, F5, D1H, 1D so i think i can safely say that i've used quite a lot of both removable and non removable grip cameras. Mount your 70-200 on a removable grip one, or better still a 300mm f2.8, and hold it by the grip and you will find it shaky i promise you. I've had lots of contact issues with the F100, D100 and 1V in particular in that the pins do not contact properly and is somewhat shaky. I think you will find a 2pc setup will always be slightly more unstable. I was amazed when the F6 was made as such.
Ansel said:Er....excuse my ignorance, but I thought you should be holding the lens instead of the body when you mount such heavy lenses like you mentioned? Also, when you mount such a setup on the tripod you should be mounting it on the lens and not the body right? :dunno: