EF 24-70mm f2.8L


Status
Not open for further replies.
These days i'm thinking that my 24-70 is a little lacking on the wide end and on the tele end.

I'm thinking that a 16-35 and 70-200 combo might be an idea instead of the 24-70 middleground.

I used to own the wide (17-40) and the tele(70-200) first for a year, then got the 24-105 to cover the middle. Now I am thinking of the 300...but not sure F2.8 or F4. Weight and cost vs F2.8 aperture and the "best image quality" for all canon lens. :think:
 

Loving it every minute :) So far I have covered 1 wedding (day and night) with it.. Just this lens (not perfect but good enough with 580EX, of cos) :thumbsup: The 105mm is so useful when I need to reach the stage while standing below... Only downside is the 24mm not wide enough... but I managed to move back while taking table shots... I will have to change to longer lens if I were to use 24-70... again it depends on your use.. The best combination will be 16-35 and 24-105 ;) just perfect

yeah, i agree wif u on that the focal length.. sometimes, i find the focal length not short enuf for me to take wide shots of buildings or classrooms.. overall rating of this lens is very good, the USM, IS, L, 105mm focal length and the image quality are very good.. the bokeh @ f4 & 105mm is considerably good for macro shots.. it is worth the buy~~ :)
 

I used to own the wide (17-40) and the tele(70-200) first for a year, then got the 24-105 to cover the middle. Now I am thinking of the 300...but not sure F2.8 or F4. Weight and cost vs F2.8 aperture and the "best image quality" for all canon lens. :think:

300L!!!! mai tu leow :bsmilie: I know 1.4x teleconverter can't satisfy you lah :lovegrin:
 

300L!!!! mai tu leow :bsmilie: I know 1.4x teleconverter can't satisfy you lah :lovegrin:

Well many people say the 300mm with the TC is very good too! That is why kena tempted again! The question is whether it is worth to get the King of Kings in picture quality or the lower end cousin.
 

Well many people say the 300mm with the TC is very good too! That is why kena tempted again! The question is whether it is worth to get the King of Kings in picture quality or the lower end cousin.

The King abit heavy wor and bulky... cousin good enough lah :bsmilie:
 

if you shoot in poor lighting conditions, only the King of the Kings (f2.8) will suffice.
else the king (f4) itself will do :)

do you have enough back/shoulder muscle for the King of the Kings ? :devil:
 

if you shoot in poor lighting conditions, only the King of the Kings (f2.8) will suffice.
else the king (f4) itself will do :)

do you have enough back/shoulder muscle for the King of the Kings ? :devil:

You doubting Lightning's biceps :sweat:
 

Loving it every minute :) So far I have covered 1 wedding (day and night) with it.. Just this lens (not perfect but good enough with 580EX, of cos) :thumbsup: The 105mm is so useful when I need to reach the stage while standing below... Only downside is the 24mm not wide enough... but I managed to move back while taking table shots... I will have to change to longer lens if I were to use 24-70... again it depends on your use.. The best combination will be 16-35 and 24-105 ;) just perfect

thanks for the info, i honestly think i'll go for the 24-105 cos of the weight. and like you said la... the IS is a bonus! =)
 

thanks for the info, i honestly think i'll go for the 24-105 cos of the weight. and like you said la... the IS is a bonus! =)

cmon and join the 24-105mm family~~ hehe..
 

Just collected my 24-70mm f2.8L yesterday... been a long 3 year wait...

Did a brief test shoot at Vivo City today... Here's the result
(Disclaimer: I don't have any scientific nor systematic method of testing hor... just shoot and enjoy shooting... )
http://www.pbase.com/jiawang/vivo_2470_test
 

Did a brief test shoot at Vivo City today... Here's the result
(Disclaimer: I don't have any scientific nor systematic method of testing hor... just shoot and enjoy shooting... )
http://www.pbase.com/jiawang/vivo_2470_test

went to the abv url to see already..

:thumbsup: to
1. bokeh (i am a sucker for it) - the cinderella item (06.jpg) :bigeyes:
2. edge and centre sharpness - 10,16,31.jpg)

someday in a few years i will get this lens..
i know miniUltraman will say BBB.. :sweat:
 

With f2.8 lens, your viewfinder is brighter.

With f2.8 lens, your AF is more accurate since more light are allowed thru.

With f2.8 lens, your cross sensor is triple the accuracy of normal cross sensor according to canon.

Wiht f2.8 lens, your become poorer ...;p
 

went to the abv url to see already..

:thumbsup: to
1. bokeh (i am a sucker for it) - the cinderella item (06.jpg) :bigeyes:
2. edge and centre sharpness - 10,16,31.jpg)

someday in a few years i will get this lens..
i know miniUltraman will say BBB.. :sweat:

I will not say it this time... zipppp :sweatsm:
 

Just collected my 24-70mm f2.8L yesterday... been a long 3 year wait...

Did a brief test shoot at Vivo City today... Here's the result
(Disclaimer: I don't have any scientific nor systematic method of testing hor... just shoot and enjoy shooting... )
http://www.pbase.com/jiawang/vivo_2470_test

went to ur gallery and esp like the pulau ubin b/w series ;)
 

hi..
i'm planning to buy 5d.. just wondering.. will the lens (range) still usefull after u own 17-40, 85, and 70-200?
 

hi..
i'm planning to buy 5d.. just wondering.. will the lens (range) still usefull after u own 17-40, 85, and 70-200?

i have this same setup. but i sold my 85.. i find it a lil too short.. 135 works more for me. in fact i use more of 24-70 and 35 now. others are either for certain assignments like gigs.. that's when i'll use the 70-200 and 17-40 more.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top