X20 thread


Tried the new X20 at the IT Show yesterday, felt pretty much at home since I had an X10 for quite a while, except the info overlay in the viewfinder which took me quite a while to figure out (it was disabled when I tried it). But I probably would still stick to the back LCD as w/ X10 if I were getting the X20. But for now I just don't have the BB impulse anymore. The Sony RX100 suits me better for my use (of a P&S camera).
 

I was at the IT show on Sunday afternoon, no more stock on the silver/black models. From the product catalogue, it looks nicer than the all black model (strange enough, the x100 limited edition is in all black finish). I would prefer the word “x20” to be printed on the top panel of the camera, just like the x10.
If I will to upgrade, i would probably be using the LCD screen to compose a shot just like what I’m currently being doing with my x10. The OVF is still 85% coverage. That’s still a minus point.
 

The OVF is still 85% coverage. That’s still a minus point.

I see it as a plus point :)

At least X10/20 gives you the option to raise the camera to your eye and shoot. Can't say the same for many other compact cameras without paying significant money for an add-on.
 

KTi said:
I see it as a plus point :)

At least X10/20 gives you the option to raise the camera to your eye and shoot. Can't say the same for many other compact cameras without paying significant money for an add-on.

10 years ago those kind of viewfinders were common in digital cameras. I think it just turned out that they aren't very useful for most people.
 

OVFs are very useful in dark environments where the noisy and grainy LCD display makes it difficult to frame the composition of the shot, and also in bright outdoor conditions where the LCD display is too dark to be seen properly. The problem with using OVFs in cameras before the Fuji X100 and now the X100s and the X20, is that we need to take our eyes away from the OVFs if we need to check on the camera settings and we can't even do it easily under bright outdoor conditions.
 

I remember with my Olympus mju (film compact), just being able to see exactly where my focus point was at made all the difference. With digital compacts before current OVFs with overlay, the plain 'eyehole' became redundant. Now, OVFs may be making a comeback!
 

One of the many reasons why I bought the x10 (for general shooting & backup my DSLR) is it has an OVF. I didn’t know then how exactly the compose is using the OVF. Coming from using film camera in the past, I really like using the OVF. As mentioned b4, the benefits of using the OVF & very few new compact come with an OVF.
Since I like to compose the way I want it (with no or min cropping) b4 shooting, 85% OVF coverage is quite a challenge for me. I hope thru’ constant practice, I can improve on my framing.
 

Test shot in room's flourescent lighting. Resized, no PS.
Manual mode; Film simulation: Velvia; Auto WB; 1/20s handheld; f2.5; ISO640; Sharpness normal; Flash off

DSCF0030_zpsa7d5e66a.jpg
 

This is my Black Beauty...

original.jpg


And these are my other black and cream 'beauties' as taken with the X20...

original.jpg

1/30s f/2.8 at 28.4mm ISO 100

original.jpg

1/30s f/2.8 at 23.7mm ISO 100

:)

pictures look quite yakky
 

Erm perhaps u would like to elaborate your comment?
 

Can someone show some high ISO pictures? maybe 1600 and 3200.
 

Can someone show some high ISO pictures? maybe 1600 and 3200.

I'm sure someone can but while you wait you can show them yourself by using Google.
 

Can someone show some high ISO pictures? maybe 1600 and 3200.

Here are some of my 'yakky' photos at ISO 1600 and 3200. ;)

Indoor at ISO 1600
149169635.jpg

1/15s f/5.0 at 21.9mm ISO 1600

Outdoor handheld night shot at ISO 1600
149169636.jpg

1/5s f/2.0 at 7.1mm ISO 1600

Outdoor handheld night shot at ISO 3200
149169637.jpg

1/7s f/2.2 at 12.2mm ISO 3200

I think ISO 1600 is still quite useable. What is really good is the image stabilisation of the X20 though.
 

Last edited:
How is the X20 noise level at ISO1600 compared to Sony RX100?
 

ISO 1600 seems quite usable if Noise reduction is applied. Not bad for its class. Fujifilm claims that its image quality us better than rx100. Can't wait for someone to do a head to head comparison
 

ISO 1600 seems quite usable if Noise reduction is applied. Not bad for its class. Fujifilm claims that its image quality us better than rx100. Can't wait for someone to do a head to head comparison
I think it's a bit of a stretch, even the first generation of Nikon 1 bodies (same sensor size than RX100) seems to have less noise.
 

I"m seriously considering this, tried touch felt it.

Called TK - 775 if i'm not wrong
MS Color - 785 around there..i think.

How much does the leather case cost?

Anyone can recommend a good shop to get..? Including the leather case..

Thanks
 

Wanted X20 1st, then consider X100s. But alas, I now have X100s. Looks like X20 will have to wait.
 

I"m seriously considering this, tried touch felt it.

Called TK - 775 if i'm not wrong
MS Color - 785 around there..i think.

How much does the leather case cost?

Anyone can recommend a good shop to get..? Including the leather case..

Thanks

I have an extra original leather case to let go if you are interested.
 

Back
Top