RossChang said:very interesting range this new rumour lense have, with L quality and IS and constant appeture, if the lense zooming is to be internal zooming, then it would be perfect~!...
BUT~!... I still AI SHI XIAO BAI~!
Belle&Sebastain said:its not a rumor afterall, its REAL
nightwolf75 said::bsmilie:
hmm... mebbe its time i look for the canon2nikon convertor... :think:
Come back to the Light Side lar...its calling you.....u must come... :devil:nightwolf75 said::bsmilie:
i was just talking to jsbn at work abt this lens. told him to sell everything except his 17-40L to buy this as his walkabt. (hope he's not reading this...) finally a decent walkabt, constant aperature lens.
hmm... mebbe its time i look for the canon2nikon convertor... :think:
nightwolf75 said::bsmilie:
i was just talking to jsbn at work abt this lens. told him to sell everything except his 17-40L to buy this as his walkabt. (hope he's not reading this...) finally a decent walkabt, constant aperature lens.
hmm... mebbe its time i look for the canon2nikon convertor... :think:
Garion said:Come back to the Light Side lar...its calling you.....u must come... :devil:
nightwolf75 said:no, my son... the dark side has consumed me. there's no turning back from the dark side... ;p
jokes aside - so, when u getting the 1dmkIIn, garion? :lovegrin:
Its not a rumour liao...see here: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0508/05082207canonlenses.aspRossChang said:very interesting range this new rumour lense have, with L quality and IS and constant appeture, if the lense zooming is to be internal zooming, then it would be perfect~!...
BUT~!... I still AI SHI XIAO BAI~!
Yah lor the Emperor brainwashed him liao...he had christened him Darth Nightwolf75. :devil:Belle&Sebastain said:must be espn, the emperor
For full frame huh...then that's another story liao...:bsmilie:CYRN said:yep. Anyway that's half of my story loh.
Pair it with 5D and 580ex... :lovegrin: ;p
Downside is that I gotta eat grass for a long long time :cry:
RossChang said:Eat grass also not enuf aahhh~~... singapore sooo lack of open space, where got place to grow grass?.....
Virgo said:For full frame huh...then that's another story liao...:bsmilie:
No need to eat grass lah...just look for more assignments to cover loh...
Terence said:If it's priced in the range of the 17-40, why not? You're probably looking at $2500 or more for a 2.8 and I don't think 1 stop is worth the price difference.
I'm always amazed at the people who lament the lack of a 2.8 stop, really, is it super neccessary? I see a case for argument between say f4 and f1.8 but really, 1 stop is not worth all this hootlah. Bump up the ISO or use a strobe, it's not too hard to overcome this slightest of limitations.
user111 said:not worth the price since its not constant 2.8
Don't be. you have options of the 24-70 F2.8L and the 28-70 F2.8L. the 24-104 F4L IS is more like a high quality general range light travel lens to meShib said:Agreed! This is a L, expect to have f2.8 and yet they put it as f4. Disappointed :thumbsd:
RossChang said:Don't be. you have options of the 24-70 F2.8L and the 28-70 F2.8L. the 24-104 F4L IS is more like a high quality general range light travel lens to me
shadowmoses said:I have a feeling its gonna be priced just slightly less than wad the 24-70L is going for. Rob Galbraith site quotes its price at abt US 1249, my estimate is that it'll prob be going for SG$1800-2000? Def significantly more than a 17-40L . IMO, it's a good range to match a FF sensor ie. 5D somemore coupled with IS. but i intend to stick to 1.6FOV bodies for now..
eAgles said:The IS feature looks very attractive but if price is ~SGD 2000, would it be more justified to get the 24-70 2.8L?? :think: