Sesshomaru
New Member
lol, here we go again...
"5dmk2 af is perfectly fine, just look at those award winning photos, tons of them are from 5dmk2!!"
"5dmk3 is too expensive, the extra features are not worth the price difference!!"
"5dmk3 won't give you the perfect-shot skill over the night!!"
"no intention to upgrade, my 5dmk2 is great i don't need high fps, I don't need so many af points!"
ppl nowadays are getting weird.
before 5dmk3 was launched, a lot of ppl shouting they want 7d af system on 5d they don't mind paying additional money for that.
now canon give you much better specs, you say it's too expensive
before 5dmk3 was launched, a lot of ppl got no choice have to go for 1dmk4/mk3 because cannot afford 1dsmk3 for the better af system.
now canon give you 1dx features on smaller body at much cheaper price, you still say it's expensive.
Really cannot understand those people...
To me, 5dmk3 definitely worth the price for the ISO and AF system performance alone.
First time to post here... and I agree with the above observation.. a typical example of "Damn if you do, damn if you don't".
But I think it is to be expected that some of the whining will be coming from the 5D2 users. They will try to justify the value of their current cam body against the 5D3.. the specs that most of us have been yearning since the introduction of the 5D2. But 5D2 is still an excellent camera... and it is not practical to upgrade just yet if this cam still satisfies most of our shooting needs. But for me, since I am still using a 400D/40D bodies for years now, this 5D3 upgrade is a big leap for me. These are the specs I really want that I held back in upgrading to 5D2 a year ago. So definitely I will start saving and purchase this one.. but will wait for few months first for the price to stabilize and reviews to come out.
