for me unused = new
but this thread in the B&S stumps me haha
but i will pardon him if its a typo, should be underused instead of unused.
:sweatsm:
I've seen "mint" with over a thousand shutter counts. :dunno:
Just have to learn how to "interpret" how CS BnS work :bsmilie:
Definition from B&S:i think "mint" is still quite ok... it can be mint copy or mint usage (in terms of physical appearance).
but if u have used a camera even once, u definitely cannot say its unused! :bsmilie:
So, even a 10 is considered Mint(-), people just don't bother to put the '(-)' in and call a 10 Mint.:bsmilie:Condition: Mint
Description: Like new. Not used since it left the shop. No signs of use.
Also known as: Mint
Condition: 10
Description: Very carefully used. Only very light user marks. Without close inspection, item would pass for mint.
Also known as: Mint(-), Near-Mint, A
i think "mint" is still quite ok... it can be mint copy or mint usage (in terms of physical appearance).
but if u have used a camera even once, u definitely cannot say its unused! :bsmilie:
:bsmilie:one year $100 drop, but mine drop $400+, only used less than 10times
anyway, if u dont trust me , u should trust Canon "L" Quality
imagine if condoms were bought and sold like cameras
Take a few shots color cannot make it, feel like throwing away
Deal @ serangoon, 2 days only before I change my mind