What in the world is Sony waiting for?


Status
Not open for further replies.
wind30 said:
mmm... but I read the nikon forums and they say the D200 is not much faster than the entry D70.

3fps is pretty fast what, with the buffer at 6 RAW files, unlimited Jpegs...

The only significant advantage is "built quality" which is hard to quantify. I mean you don't see the entry level DSLRs (D70) breaking down that often either. So is "built quality" worth the anti-shake and anti-dust?

One shot 1 kill....or less shot 1 kill....the better. I respect. Many burst shot (blind burst) then choose...might as well use a video mode in my HP camera.....can select frame...hahahaha:bsmilie:
 

haha i totally agree with sulhan :bsmilie:
 

Only 2 days more. We'll see what Sony is going to offer.
 

wind30 said:
mmm... but I read the nikon forums and they say the D200 is not much faster than the entry D70.

3fps is pretty fast what, with the buffer at 6 RAW files, unlimited Jpegs...

For me, fast is more than just the continuous shot rate. I would also include startup time from idle, shutter lag and AF speed. Unless there are improvements in these areas or something like weatherseal, things like 10 mp would not be sufficient incentive for me to "upgrade" to an Alpha from my 5D. I'll rather hear announcement of when an upgraded 7D would be launched.

wind30 said:
The only significant advantage is "built quality" which is hard to quantify. I mean you don't see the entry level DSLRs (D70) breaking down that often either. So is "built quality" worth the anti-shake and anti-dust?
Even when a competing model offers weatherseal feature? Let's remember that whilst they don't have AS in their bodies, there are lenses with image stabilisation for the major brands in the market. I think the value all depends on how one uses image stabilisation.
 

sulhan said:
One shot 1 kill....or less shot 1 kill....the better. I respect. Many burst shot (blind burst) then choose...might as well use a video mode in my HP camera.....can select frame...hahahaha:bsmilie:

I also prefer to use timing to take a single shot but shooting moving targets I keep the multiple shot mode on. Maybe as a newbie, iit is my lack of skills but there are times when I know I wouldn't be able to time the shot satisfactorily such as wing angle of a flying bird or the spread of the flare of a dancer's skirt. Inspite of the 5D having 3fps, I do miss the 4fps rate of my Dynax 5 and my "prosumer" digicam. So a faster burst rate is something I would welcome even though I won't be able to see the picture in the later shots.
 

smtan24 said:
Only 2 days more. We'll see what Sony is going to offer.

I wonder are they gona sell the body on the same day??
:think:
 

If they did my friend who own a camera shop hasn't told me he is bringing an Alphas.
 

AncientMariner said:
I also prefer to use timing to take a single shot but shooting moving targets I keep the multiple shot mode on. Maybe as a newbie, iit is my lack of skills but there are times when I know I wouldn't be able to time the shot satisfactorily such as wing angle of a flying bird or the spread of the flare of a dancer's skirt. Inspite of the 5D having 3fps, I do miss the 4fps rate of my Dynax 5 and my "prosumer" digicam. So a faster burst rate is something I would welcome even though I won't be able to see the picture in the later shots.
err, not questioning your info?? Which prosumer camera did 4fps? I mean I really interested to know.
 

The body will be released for sale in July...
 

AncientMariner said:
Lumix FZ10
That's really a rare feature, even my FZ5 (or other's FZ20) can only manage 3fps only, FZ10 does have its advantage.
 

zcf said:
That's really a rare feature, even my FZ5 (or other's FZ20) can only manage 3fps only, FZ10 does have its advantage.

The disadvantage is really crap JPEG compression...
 

Drudkh said:

from that thread:

DT 11-18mm F4.5-5.6
16mm F2.8 Fisheye
DT 18-200mm F3.5-6.3
DT 18-70mm F3.5-5.6
20mm F2.8
24-105mm F3.5-4.5
28mm F2.8
35mm F1.4 G
50mm F1.4
50mm F2.8 Macro
70-200mm F2.8 G
75-300mm F4.5-5.6
Planar T 85mm F1.4 ZA
100mm F2.8 Macro
Sonnar T 135mm F1.8 ZA
135mm F2.8 [T4.5] STF
300mm F2.8 G
500mm F8 Reflex
1.4X Teleconverter
2X Teleconverter

18 lenses and 2 teleconverters. quite believable except for some odd things... how come no 50mm 1.7, 17-35 or 28-75? why two 135mm lenses? what happened to the minolta 85mm?

if this is true, nice surprise that they kept the stf and the 500 mirror. wonder if updated version (ssm) of the 17-35, 28-75, 200 will be released later. would also like to see a 28 f2 and a 70-210 f4, but haiyah wait and wait and see lah. and who knows man, maybe there will be a killer 85mm stf/soft portrait lens to replace the old version... wishful thinking hehehe
 

TREE22_2.jpg


TREE22_1.jpg


source: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1037&message=18704750

a couple of the new sony lenses http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1037&message=18705150
 

Hiee...

Well..from the looks of it....the next body after the Alpha-100 may be a full frame.
The follwing lens seem to tell me so.

24-105, 16mm fish (from the photo....bad move by them to change the hood of this one to plastic.....i think the original one is better), 20mm....
 

I wonder will they be selling the lens soon. They can easily sell the lens as it should be backward compatible with our old Minolta cameras.
 

They are supporting A-Mount mah. Shldn't be a problem. :think:
 

If the leaked photo is correct, then it seems that my predictions are correct... the new camera is a replacement for the 5D but its features seems a hybrid of the 7D and 5D.... note the 2 dials... Sony seems to have heard us users...
 

Ok GUYS..it one more day liao!!!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top