Tamron's new 24-70mm f2.8 VC


Taken handheld at 65mm, F2.8, 1/30 sec, ISO 4000


14469_10151777785403556_1300652726_n.jpg
 

Got my lens back today from the service centre. Not sure if its just me or the lens is really a lemon. I was told that there was a front focus issue but after getting it calibrated, the picture still appears soft. Would any kind soul please share with me a high res photo, shot with this lens in jpeg with the picture style set to Faithful with zero sharpening. I want to compare it with my pictures and decide if I should asked for an exchange. I'm really going nuts thinking about it. Kind of even making me regret using a 3rd party lens.
 

is your lens soft at 24mm or 70mm? sorry i cant help as I don't own this lens... but my impression when trying at a camera shop was that it is sharp at 24mm and not that sharp at 70mm
 

is your lens soft at 24mm or 70mm? sorry i cant help as I don't own this lens... but my impression when trying at a camera shop was that it is sharp at 24mm and not that sharp at 70mm

Mine is soft at both length, 24 and 70. I tried +- 1 micro af and it just makes things worst. :(
 

Mine is soft at both length, 24 and 70. I tried +- 1 micro af and it just makes things worst. :(

Which camera body are you using?
Pls post a sample "soft" pic.
 

Pls post a sample "soft" pic.

Here are the sample pics taken. One at 24mm follow by its 100% crop and the other at 70mm followed by its 100%. All photos have no sharpening applied in camera or pp and the 100% crop are at it's focus point.
Shot wide open across all focal length.

24mm
9441797109_dc319fc2f3_o.jpg


100% crop
9444584296_53c1daa234_o.jpg


70mm
9441797595_a0b976826e_o.jpg


100% crop
9441797345_66ffa83bde_o.jpg
 

Here's another one at taken at home.

9444768820_462174b9ce_o.jpg


24mm
9441965161_cffe9c1591_o.jpg


100% crop
9441964897_153fd0f8f4_o.jpg


As you can see, the images are not sharp as shown by many examples here. :(
 

Did u use tripod for those test shot?
 

Good question...and when you use the tripod, pls switch off the VC.

Yes the 3rd shot at 24mm is on a tripod with vc off. The first two are handheld with vc on. So do you think I could have a bad copy here?
 

+ / - 1 focus adjustment settings usually don't do much to help, try + / - 5 or even 10 to see if any potential front or back focusing is corrected.

the GSH shot looks odd, nothing seems focused. Nandos shot, seems like the wooden holder the menus is standing on is sharper, can't tell from such small size.

coke bottle looks like the water droplets on the left of bottle near the 500ml is sharper. cant tell for sure as well.

perhaps instead of looking at the AF point 100% crop, try searching the entire image to see which part is the Sharpest. That should tell u if the lens is front or back focusing.
 

Normally lenses don't perform the best when at largest and smallest aperture. Also any filter on the lens? Use only the center auto-focus point for those shots?

Sorry can't comment much on the sharpness as not really pixel peek.

At speed of 1/8 handheld even with VC, you may still have some some camera shake.

And even on the tripod, may still have some shake. Worst if the tripod are not the very stable type. That why some will use ways to reduce the chances of those shake. E.g use remote, set timer, use mirror up etc.
 

Last edited:
Well i have given up. Did a lot of testing with and without tripod. With and without vc and it just yields the same result. Just my luck. Think i will bring it back to Tamron service center and see if i could get a new copy instead. :(
 

Normally lenses don't perform the best when at largest and smallest aperture. Also any filter on the lens? Use only the center auto-focus point for those shots?

Sorry can't comment much on the sharpness as not really pixel peek.

At speed of 1/8 handheld even with VC, you may still have some some camera shake.

And even on the tripod, may still have some shake. Worst if the tripod are not the very stable type. That why some will use ways to reduce the chances of those shake. E.g use remote, set timer, use mirror up etc.

I did the test with a 10 sec timer on live view, magnified 10x with mirror lock up, center af point only and vc off for the coke shot. The tripod i used was a manfrotto 055X Pro B, a very heavy, strong and sturdy tripod. I do have a B+W UV filter attached though. from all the pictures i have seen here, it's pretty sharp at 2.8. :(
 

Last edited:
hopefully they will do a swap for you! update us on the results.

Well i have given up. Did a lot of testing with and without tripod. With and without vc and it just yields the same result. Just my luck. Think i will bring it back to Tamron service center and see if i could get a new copy instead. :(
 

Yes the 3rd shot at 24mm is on a tripod with vc off. The first two are handheld with vc on. So do you think I could have a bad copy here?

It looks like you do have a soft copy.
Mine is sharp from 2.8 and down to 1/x sec.
Whether the FL is 24mm or 70mm, its still sharp.
Only issues with this lens are:
>It vignets at f2.8,
>It distorts at 24mm
otherwise I love mine to bits because of the price and the VC.

Only other qualm I have is that in low light, the focus acquisition isn't very fast.
 

It looks like you do have a soft copy.
Mine is sharp from 2.8 and down to 1/x sec.
Whether the FL is 24mm or 70mm, its still sharp.
Only issues with this lens are:
>It vignets at f2.8,
>It distorts at 24mm
otherwise I love mine to bits because of the price and the VC.

Only other qualm I have is that in low light, the focus acquisition isn't very fast.

Bro would you mind sharing a jpeg straight ooc at 24 and 70mm on faithful picture style so that I have a case with the service centre please?
 

Yo..

Here you go..

Dunno if this is sufficient. (I don't even know if you consider the image is sharp) I never stopped to think if my lens had any back/front focussing issues. Do let me know if you think it is. Appreciate it.

Cheers.

I was focussing on the gold rim of the coin.

Settings :
ISO 400 f2.8 1/13
Handheld, VC on


IMG_5852 by Norman Selvaraju, on Flickr


IMG_5851 by Norman Selvaraju, on Flickr
 

Last edited:
Back
Top