[SunChasersSG] - TCSS thread (Part V)

[scubagolfer]

Haha, then might as well get the 1Ds Mark III and 14L II, 16-35L II and 24L II right =p

Hehe, that one coming up next, after gaining experience, change system

 

[MGohzxc]

People only primary 5, and you start poisoning her BBB.... you ar.. no good la bro... :nono:

He...He... Is OK la.. Will not be too much now but slowly will buy
Already have ND106 and and last week got my ND110. Next week buy GND filter....
But he will buy the UWA for me.. I think:think::think:

 

[MGohzxc]

My Dad bought me the Canon but I always think Nikon is better. The colors are so nice..:think::think:
COMMENT PLEASE

 

[Numnumball]

My Dad bought me the Canon but I always think Nikon is better. The colors are so nice..:think::think:
COMMENT PLEASE

Wah... Dun start a brand war here although u r right :bsmilie:

I can ONI say all are equal n each camp has their own positives

 

[frankchn]

My Dad bought me the Canon but I always think Nikon is better. The colors are so nice..:think::think:
COMMENT PLEASE

You can tweak Picture Styles to get the saturation you want though.

 

[MGohzxc]

Wah... Dun start a brand war here although u r right :bsmilie:

I can ONI say all are equal n each camp has their own positives

No lah , no war . PEACE!

You can tweak Picture Styles to get the saturation you want though.

Yes , that's right

 

[coolthought]

How about Fullframe?? :devil:

I've been only reading mag that meant for poor amateur like me :sweatsm:
but there a short review I came across for 16-35. It coincides with Kit's. The 16-35 is a good lens except when use for archi urban landscape shoot due to..... can't remember... :think:
haven't come across anything on 14-24 yet....

 

[coolthought]

:devil: but if you take 8 photos and stitch it is the widest you can go on 35mm FF on any system - UWA to me

just curious... how's the distortion for the TS-E 17mm?
Have you stitch photos taken with this lens? How's it goes?
as far as I know, it won't be good stitching distorted photos....

 

[frankchn]

just curious... how's the distortion for the TS-E 17mm?
Have you stitch photos taken with this lens? How's it goes?
as far as I know, it won't be good stitching distorted photos....

It is very very good - especially if you are moving the camera left and right while keeping the lens in one position so you don't have any foreground object shifting around.

 

[korbidp3k]

The 16-35 is a good lens except when use for archi urban landscape shoot due to..... can't remember... :think:

If i'm not wrong its because of high distortion

 

[frankchn]

If i'm not wrong its because of high distortion

The Canon 16-35L II isn't particularly sharp in the corners either - when compared to the 17TS, 24TS II or the Nikon 14-24mm.

 

[daredevil123]

If i'm not wrong its because of high distortion

Not just high distortion but complex distortion. It matters in archi shots, but for sunrise, nature landscapes, it doesn't matter much.

But it is as sharp as a brand new razor. One of the sharpest lenses I've seen.

 

[Numnumball]

If i'm not wrong its because of high distortion

So long if u dun shoot anything straight, its one hell of a lens.. Its almost like a semi FE at 16mm.. if u know how to use it.. cab actually put into gd use

 

[Numnumball]

Not just high distortion but complex distortion. It matters in archi shots, but for sunrise, nature landscapes, it doesn't matter much.

But it is as sharp as a brand new razor. One of the sharpest lenses I've seen.

Its one of the hardest to correct that i had come across so far.. even my ex 17-35mm perform better in this area.. But its is "wide", razor sharp and constrasty img quality that wow and win me over.. :heart:

Cant really make it for archi/interior.. too much distortion to correct, till u lose pixels.. I might be getting a 14-24 to complement this for tat purpose... :think:

 

[daredevil123]

So long if u dun shoot anything straight, its one hell of a lens.. Its almost like a semi FE at 16mm.. if u know how to use it.. cab actually put into gd use

Not to mention the lens is sharp as hell... touch it will get cut and bleed... :bsmilie: :devil:

 

[daredevil123]

Its one of the hardest to correct that i had come across so far.. even my ex 17-35mm perform better in this area.. But its is "wide", razor sharp and constrasty img quality that wow and win me over.. :heart:

Cant really make it for archi/interior.. too much distortion to correct, till u lose pixels.. I might be getting a 14-24 to complement this for tat purpose... :think:

Bro... 14-24 is nice, but expensive and no filters yet. Even when the LEE one comes out, it will be hella expensive bro....

 

[Numnumball]

Bro... 14-24 is nice, but expensive and no filters yet. Even when the LEE one comes out, it will be hella expensive bro....

Handheld lo or DIY.. think i dun intend to get the SW150 (Lee filter holder for 14024) price tag not really justified... wait for chiong (3rd party china made) one la.. :devil:

 

[daredevil123]

Handheld lo or DIY.. think i dun intend to get the SW150 (Lee filter holder for 14024) price tag not really justified... wait for chiong (3rd party china made) one la.. :devil:

Bro Tokina announced a F2.8 UWA for FX.

http://www.dpreview.com/news/1007/10070501tokina16_28mmnikoncanon.asp

*EDIT: I just noticed... no filter thread as well.. sigh....

 

[wildcat]

My Dad bought me the Canon but I always think Nikon is better. The colors are so nice..:think::think:
COMMENT PLEASE

I'm always around if you wanna swap :bsmilie:

 

[wildcat]

DD123 ...... you are SO in the wrong brother........... you forgot to thank the person asking the question for the privilege of providing a detailed answer :bsmilie:

Warrao... if it comes to this, I also will peng :bsmilie: (<-- no pun on that last word).