Sony - RX1
- Thread starter wxwayne
- Start date
- Status
Thoth
Senior Member
Taken wif RX1 nonetheless... See? We R still relating to RX1!!! :bsmilie:
shanelong
New Member
:what:
Thanks. They are all out of the camera without editing. Hmmm... Come to think of it, I haven't heard people discussing on the type of setting for saturation/contrast for the camera.
I find that my shots are not too steady. I recommend either using the EVF or thumb-up. They will help to stabilise the camera.
No steady shot? The IS not working har?
No IS for RX1 in photography mode la..
If you choose auto ISO, i notice generally (if not always) the camera will choose 1/80 as the minimum shutter speed. That should generally be sufficient to capture a steady shot?
If you choose auto ISO, i notice generally (if not always) the camera will choose 1/80 as the minimum shutter speed. That should generally be sufficient to capture a steady shot?
TWmilkteaTW
Senior Member
Yea..But the LX7 cant take pic like the RX1 and etc etc.
and pls dont bring price into the picture or comparison.
Compromise..give and take lei. Maybe the next version will have IS. But then its 35mm.. maybe thats why they exclude the IS. and maybe so to ensure the package is compact enough.
Shocking ! A camera costing $4k and they can't afford to put in IS ! I didn't expect that at all. Probably one of the reasons why all the images posted so far looked so underwhelming to me. Not sharp at all.
Which other full frame has in body IS ?
Shocking ! A camera costing $4k and they can't afford to put in IS ! I didn't expect that at all. Probably one of the reasons why all the images posted so far looked so underwhelming to me. Not sharp at all.
I am sure you wouldn't say that if you have had the chance to use the camera and viewed the files.
Shocking ! A camera costing $4k and they can't afford to put in IS ! I didn't expect that at all. Probably one of the reasons why all the images posted so far looked so underwhelming to me. Not sharp at all.
don't think its the camera issue? if its true..think we would have seen complain over the Net already.
maybe u can look at more photos here http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1168684/0
Last edited:
tomcat
Senior Member
Sony A99 ?
Shocking ! A camera costing $4k and they can't afford to put in IS ! I didn't expect that at all. Probably one of the reasons why all the images posted so far looked so underwhelming to me. Not sharp at all.
Go talk to leica then... or hassleblad...
An IS mechanism would have added a lot of bulk to the lens.
The camera is heavier than usual pns camera, so holding it at a distance will result in movement when shutter is pressed. I am more used to dslr of shooting where I hold the camera close to me when taking pictures.
Maybe it's just me not good in using RX-1.
- Status
