Yes, I am using EVF, can't do without it for MF.
So far, MF is fine, using E-PL1 is very similar to E-P2. Thoughts below ...
Pros:
- E-PL1 has a better handgrip, subsequently with the shutter button moved a bit forward for ergonomics. This is the biggest advantage, unless one has big hands or longer fingers, which I do, so have to get used to it or make a case to bulk it up a bit to the width of the E-P2. Adds stability to compensate for the 1-stop less IBIS on E-PL1 compared to E-P2
- Magnify function has its own button near the shutter, well placed unlike the OK button of the E-P2. Although only used occasionally, it is more intuitive
- REC and FN buttons near the shutter also can be reconfigured, I use the REC as AE Lock, still thinking what to assign to Fn button
- A faint outline of the metering area size can be seen for spot and center-weighted, nice touch
- better ISO handling in terms of noise and color retention, another stronger feature, good for those really dim lights
Cons:
- Shutter button is stiffer and slightly louder than E-P2, a soft button release is definitely welcome, which I use on both cameras. E-P2 seems better damped
- EVF seems to stick out more towards the rear (where LCD is) than E-P2, but one gets used to it
- Only 1/2000 maximum shutter speed
- buttons are more recessed, not as easy to feel/grope for blindly
Conclusion for me is that E-PL1 nudges out the E-P2 just a bit. The E-PL1 is not really a cheap camera, it only appears so. After adding in an EVF, just slightly less than E-P2.
.