i prefer using lcd since i find quicker n look more touristy when taking street photo
Me too, one key advantage of GRD model is it's size/portability. I don't use any accessories, love the convenience of just put it in my pocket when not in use.
i prefer using lcd since i find quicker n look more touristy when taking street photo
May I know what the GRDIV has which GR is lacking or weaker? Interesting price the GRDIV indeed.
I think it's well summarized by silvermoon1407 in Thread Ricoh GR as below:
"I would actually go for the GRD4, if you already have a primary camera.
Why?
GRD4 has IS and faster by 1 stop, so in total maybe 3-4 stops advantage in preventing handheld blur. Of course you can bump iso in the GR, but u may end up comparing iso 800 of GRD4 with iso 6400 of GR for same exposure. Noise would probably be comparable? I dunno.
GRD4, being smaller sensor, has the advantage of closer macro n larger dof, which would be popular for ppl looking at this kinda form factor camera...
Image quality n dynamic range cannot be compared... But the ability to shoot raw can allow u to get images of better dynamic range and lower noise. I'll get LR4 with the $600 savings.
Most importantly, GR is not an upgrade of the GRD4. It's a completely different camera. Getting a GRD4 is like getting the best of what that product line has to offer, unless they come out with a GRD5 which really wouldn't make sense now.
Just my personal view
"
Anyone getting the wide lens for the GRDIV? Any reviews?
I'm still considering...
Nobody believe it's true, especially with only S$390 now. You sell any one lens you can get it. You still want to wait? hahahaGreg you spreading the GRD IV poison. Thankfully I am broke kekeke.
:cheers:
I think it's well summarized by silvermoon1407 in Thread Ricoh GR as below:
"I would actually go for the GRD4, if you already have a primary camera.
Why?
GRD4 has IS and faster by 1 stop, so in total maybe 3-4 stops advantage in preventing handheld blur. Of course you can bump iso in the GR, but u may end up comparing iso 800 of GRD4 with iso 6400 of GR for same exposure. Noise would probably be comparable? I dunno.
GRD4, being smaller sensor, has the advantage of closer macro n larger dof, which would be popular for ppl looking at this kinda form factor camera...
Image quality n dynamic range cannot be compared... But the ability to shoot raw can allow u to get images of better dynamic range and lower noise. I'll get LR4 with the $600 savings.
Most importantly, GR is not an upgrade of the GRD4. It's a completely different camera. Getting a GRD4 is like getting the best of what that product line has to offer, unless they come out with a GRD5 which really wouldn't make sense now.
Just my personal view
"
GRDIV ??? ( Buy for my son ? but he is not into photography ! He is into archery !)
??? :think::think::think::think:
Wah! Macro 1cm, Depth of field with smaller sensor ! Internal Stabilization, GR is not upgrade of GRDIV !
Like that I must think of an excuse ! I already use these excuses to buy new cameras
Q10 >> buy for my wife (Approved! my wife used on her recent trip overseas)
K5IIs >> My birthday coming ! ( Wife not approved as already got Kr )
GR >> Sold 3 of my Pentax lens DA35 f2.4 + DA50 f1.8 + Sigma 70-300mm = $700, top up only $340 to get GR ! (Approved)
GRDIV ??? ( Buy for my son ? but he is not into photography ! He is into archery !)
??? :think::think::think::think:
You kidding? With a GR already, you want to get a GRD4 as well? - if you really think GRD4 is a must to get, I don't mind to exchange with GR:bsmilie: