just curious :think:
did the participating photographers and models know that a reporter will be shooting them for the article ... ?
yes LTB, we all know.. i already informed everyone before the shoot started.. thanks
just curious :think:
did the participating photographers and models know that a reporter will be shooting them for the article ... ?
IMO, the only big loser/winner in this report, is the Photographer with that Crouching tiger stand ..... he got the most publicity! :sweat:
IMO, the only big loser/winner in this report, is the Photographer with that Crouching tiger stand ..... he got the most publicity! :sweat:
You haven't seen his Hidden Dragon stance yet. :bsmilie: :bsmilie:
Here's his Enter the Dragon stance for training pushing exposure button:
i beg to differ. in the case of the crouching tiger, which person would not notice a camera aimed at them?
a person could also tell that a shot taken from the second story would not have given the perspective of the photo that was published in the papers.
it can be inferred that the photogs and models were therefore aware of the ST reporter's presence. I know you are a long time supporter of candleghost and his shoots, but really, is there a need for such obstinance?
lol @ candleghost too. i know you like to allow your photographers to shoot stuff hurr? a certain sb24 user from your shoot was caught taking pictures of another model at another shoot. So, this photographer taking pictures of your models also nothing wrong what. sneaky meh.?
IMHO, the report by Debbie Yong is neutrally opinionated, and quite factual. Mervin has said that his printed statements were his, but Sophia has insisted that she was misquoted to a certain extend (usually the reporter will want to write what she thinks the reader would like to read).
Whilst TNP reports concentrated on the CS models, this one focuses on the CS organizers. I am sure, for the Part III, the reporter will zoom in to some CS photographers.
IMO, the small winner is Clubsnap as the report give us some publicity again.
Krislynn looks pretty on the photo. The reflector boy adds some glam to CS organised shoots (holding reflector service :bsmilie: ), and Mike is proclaimed as a pro with many years of organising experience ....
All these add up to a decent report on a Sunday paper. No breaking news, but done well.....
IMO, the only big loser/winner in this report, is the Photographer with that Crouching tiger stand ..... he got the most publicity! :sweat::sweat::sweat:
shooters from surrephoto's shoot went to shoot your models? lol you see ghost? the only uninvited guests were the ones from your group.
if u wan talk about last sunday de bikini issue.. lets talk.. your group come shoot mine.. we didnt say anything... my shooter shoot your model.. you kpkb...i said le.. i got no issue on this.. if you wan.. go report police.. i am fine with it.. and remember .. who started the issue?
i'm was there for the shoot, knowing some detail... the ST journalist is a invited guest by candleghost n the ST journalist actually got a permission from candleghost to do the shoot openly.. (without disturbing the shoot)
thru what i know surrephoto did not state clearly on the issue about the ST journalist n creating a misunderstanding to every one tot he is a spy in the shoot..
also to my understanding the picture shown the ST journalist, he was on his way down n spot there is a group shooting.. without disturbing the group, that is y he is sitting on the stair to view his shots..
to the whole thing from what i c, that is surrephoto is trying to tell everyone.. he is there for the shoot n got a interview with the ST journalist... i believe surrephoto was so happy till forget to let everyone know about ST journalist was invited n posting a misleading picture...
This is the kopitiam and i am simply showing photographs to showcase some real-life images of what happened.
"He takes a shot.." Did i say he was doing it at the moment? Was he at the exact moment of pressing the trigger?
"The next day". It's true that the photograph appeared in the papers the next day.
Please, i did not specify the details not means i'm trying to mislead people...
Bro, though the first image is comical, the end result is unfairness (to the reporter) and in this case, quite misleading. We hate reporter or anyone who does such misrepresentation of facts, but can we accept our own action? In your case, you should have, if you have known, declared that the reporter was invited.:nono:
Nice shots! :bsmilie::sweatsm:
ok thanks ber for explaining this.. i close case le.. thanks
Did i specify the exact details of the photographs?
This is the kopitiam and i am simply showing photographs to showcase some real-life images of what happened.
"He takes a shot.." Did i say he was doing it at the moment? Was he at the exact moment of pressing the trigger?
"The next day". It's true that the photograph appeared in the papers the next day.
Please, i did not specify the details not means i'm trying to mislead people...