albertri
Senior Member
Thoth said:Interesting, Leica M bodies u mean?
Yeah ill try to dig up that link could be steve huff or ken but not 100% sure.
Thoth said:Interesting, Leica M bodies u mean?
Yeah ill try to dig up that link could be steve huff or ken but not 100% sure.
I'll google too... Just seen an intersting comparison review between X Pro 1, X-E1 & NEX 7...
¼ò»¯¶ø²»¼òµ¥ ¸´¹Å΢µ¥¸»Ê¿X-E1ÆÀ²â_¸»Ê¿ÊýÂëÏà»úÆÀ²â-ÅÝÅÝÍø
从对比结果看,ISO 800以下时三款微单的表现不相上下,而在高ISO情况下,X-Pro1和X-E1差别不大,但我觉得X-E1的细节表现更加优异;而索尼NEX-7具备的2400万像素解析力还是很不错的,细线的质感能更好的体现,但在高感抗噪性能上则和X-E1有一定的差距,看来高像素有时候也不一定是件好事。
I just pray that all the existing issues wif NEX 7 will be cleared by the time they launch FF NEX. Also, ability to AF continuously with super fast tracking on subject will be great. Able to get clean images even at 12500 ISO will also be good... Haha.. Anything else wanan add?
tntrue said:The last firmware update ameliorated the movie button issue, which was the only big problem I had with the NEX-7.
The biggest issue I see is coming up with glass that's capable of exploiting all these megapixels. Of the Sony/KM-branded glass I've owned, the only ones that could make full use of the NEX-7's resolution were the Minolta 200mm f/2.8 APO and the 70-300G (at 300mm f/8). The ZA 135mm f/1.8 came close, but not quite. The ZA 24-70mm, spectacular on 24MP FF, wasn't even close on APS-C.
That's why a lot of people are clamoring for certain pieces of legacy glass or RF lenses these days: the newer stuff, built to a price point rather than a level of quality, just doesn't cut the mustard.
I'm eager to see some hands-on reviews of the new 10-18mm lens. That might yield some insight as to Sony's future intentions for e-mount.
The last firmware update ameliorated the movie button issue, which was the only big problem I had with the NEX-7.
The biggest issue I see is coming up with glass that's capable of exploiting all these megapixels. Of the Sony/KM-branded glass I've owned, the only ones that could make full use of the NEX-7's resolution were the Minolta 200mm f/2.8 APO and the 70-300G (at 300mm f/8). The ZA 135mm f/1.8 came close, but not quite. The ZA 24-70mm, spectacular on 24MP FF, wasn't even close on APS-C.
That's why a lot of people are clamoring for certain pieces of legacy glass or RF lenses these days: the newer stuff, built to a price point rather than a level of quality, just doesn't cut the mustard.
I'm eager to see some hands-on reviews of the new 10-18mm lens. That might yield some insight as to Sony's future intentions for e-mount.
kei1309 said:one more:
the CZ 16-35mm
one more:
the CZ 16-35mm
yup. i've shot with it. extremely blurred and soft corners even at F8
Oh, you mean it's one that can't resolve the NEX-7 sensor? I thought you meant the opposite.![]()
Ok back to photo sharing else the Mods will kick me out of this forum for OTing lolz
Finally gotten a M39-NEX adaptor so i could use the Jupiter-3 (FSU Lens) or the 50mm f1.5 this is a CZ Sonnar copy, here's some quick snaps. Sadly the lighting is indoor so ISO is darn high will try to take at lower ISO so NR wont kick in
My only problem with this lens is the MFD is 1M :-(
Sorry for nood question wat FSU lens
albertri said:Florida State University lolz just kidding bro I think its Federation of Soviet Unionmeaning lenses made in former USSR
Oic. I din even know it myself. C? Difference between basic me n intermediate u. Cheers.
albertri said:lolz you bro just happen you're not into cheap russian lenses![]()
![]()
Actually tried fudgecake's Jupiter before. Find it very soft d image. But Bokeh is quite nice.
albertri said:the 50/2? yeah it's soft... these lenses are good for portraits so you dont need editing lolz. This Jupiter I have is 50 f1.5 i find it soft compare to cron 50 or 90 but it renders differentlykinda like the bokeh of this lens