Pictures from NEX 7, Thread I


Status
Not open for further replies.
two more recent shots
8153775278_ae973e43be_c.jpg

8153771400_0abf18a66b_c.jpg
 

No it is a Germany voigtlander prominent 50mm f/1.5. A lens more than 50 years old. Shot at aperture fully open.
 

No it is a Germany voigtlander prominent 50mm f/1.5. A lens more than 50 years old. Shot at aperture fully open.

Kool... Who says vintage lenses r lousy? LOL
 

this thread is getting more and more poisonous.... the last lens for this year i guess, would be the SEL1018

:bsmilie:
 

this thread is getting more and more poisonous.... the last lens for this year i guess, would be the SEL1018

:bsmilie:

Hoping for a prime UWA lens.......................................:(
 

Jeremy1 said:
Hoping for a prime UWA lens.......................................:(

16mm lens for you. ;-)
 

I shoot RAW and NEX7 raw is very pale and flat and somewhat soft so you need to process them a bit more :-) for me I try to correct my WB, clean a bit of noise if any, sharpen it a bit and pull the contrast and saturation coz when i compare the NEX7 OOC JPEG is more contrasty, sharper and saturated even in normal settings (I mean NEX7 JPEG vs RAW)

I dont use creative settings once you have a RAW files you can almost do a lot to it.

Hi Albertri

thanks for sharing
thank you
 

kei1309 said:
this thread is getting more and more poisonous.... the last lens for this year i guess, would be the SEL1018

:bsmilie:

Hahaha no worries ur cure is in ur bank
 

wangzb said:
Hahaha no worries ur cure is in ur bank

U haven't seen her next year wish list. Haha
 

Thoth said:
U haven't seen her next year wish list. Haha

Next year? RX1 (tentative), FF NEX (tentative), and 85mm and 135mm lenses.
 

Few more pix this time these are JPEG not 100% OOC sorry guys I always shoot AWB so I do some adjustment when needed in LR but all of these are JPEG setting is standard and NR the lowest setting you can set on NEX :P no sharpening done opn these pix (some I crop a bit but most are original size)

My uber model lolz this is taken by another vintage lens should be in the 60-70's lens Canon FL 85 f1.8 @ wide open ISO800
8160156933_988539da9b_c.jpg




Below Photos are taken using Leica Summicron 90mm f2.0 (Non-APO) all at f2

8160215372_e1aac6e824_c.jpg


8160213150_be204de192_c.jpg


8160211096_6d74281cb3_c.jpg


8160173811_510677afb6_c.jpg
 

Last edited:
cont... still Leica Summicron 90mm f2.0

8160171247_23d9560aa8_c.jpg


8160202712_7d13a608a4_c.jpg


8160162121_19db41927d_c.jpg
 

cont... still Leica Summicron 90mm f2.0

8160171247_23d9560aa8_c.jpg


8160202712_7d13a608a4_c.jpg


8160162121_19db41927d_c.jpg

Nice... Cron 90/2.0... non ASPH rite? Is there just a ASPH version for 90/2.0? coz I know there is a APO ASPH version which is way too ex...
 

Nice... Cron 90/2.0... non ASPH rite? Is there just a ASPH version for 90/2.0? coz I know there is a APO ASPH version which is way too ex...



Thanks bro, nope from what I read for the Leica-R cron 90/2.0 only releases 3 version Series VII and E55 the disticntion between ver1 and ver 2 is ver 1 has only one section built in hood like of those Leica Elmarit 135 f2.8 design whislt the 2nd version is with 2-section built in hood similar to Leica-R Cron 50/2.0. Then the 3rd version is the ASPH-APO which was in production from 2000-2009 for the R-Mount. and cost like 5-7 times as the pre-asph cron-r version :-(
 

Last edited:
Few more pix this time these are JPEG not 100% OOC sorry guys I always shoot AWB so I do some adjustment when needed in LR but all of these are JPEG setting is standard and NR the lowest setting you can set on NEX :P no sharpening done opn these pix (some I crop a bit but most are original size)

My uber model lolz this is taken by another vintage lens should be in the 60-70's lens Canon FL 85 f1.8 @ wide open ISO800
8160156933_988539da9b_c.jpg

Pretty good for an old FL85f1.8, value for money, and when used properly, you really don't need the R90f2.
 

Pretty good for an old FL85f1.8, value for money, and when used properly, you really don't need the R90f2.

true bro this lens is not bad at all it's 40-50% cheaper than the cheapest Cron90/2.0 :-) but they render differently Canon tend to be in mild color and when shooting head-waist you need to step down a bit to f2.0 to get the sharpness you need. Cron 90/2 the colors pops and sharpness is great. I kinda regretted sold my FL 55/1.2 to a fellow NEX7 user :-( reason is coz of my cron 50/2

I got two copy of this Canon FL 85/1.8 one was bought from fellow Cser the other one was a gift from a friend in the US comes with full package like new the leather case, hood caps etc. sadly the leather case inside cushion sux the Japs uses foam for the top and bottom portion of the case and you know foam after a while it get crusty and start to fall off :-( very good lens bad packaging lolz.
 

Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top