There goes my hope for the E-7
There goes my hope for the E-7
Yes, no hope.
Olympus are always doing something silly, aren't they?
Too bad I can't take everything from the E-M1 and stuff it into the Panasonic GH3 body that I already have--or even the E-1 I have.
Despite Olympus saying that the E-M1 is targeted toward Four-Thirds users, I'm not sure who those users are because the people with E-4x0, E-5x0, and E-6x0 aren't going to spent US$1399.99 on a body and the E-1, E-3, E-30, and E-5 users are going to find the E-M1 the wrong size.
Maybe because Sony is the largest shareholder of Olympus?on amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html/ref=search_sparkle_EM1?ie=UTF8&docId=1001385991&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=auto-sparkle&pf_rd_r=1EKWC3K58CJE9XJV6TQS&pf_rd_t=301&pf_rd_p=1612638402&pf_rd_i=Olympus%20E-M1%2012-40mm
LOL @ the big sony banner... why is that banner there??
regards,
wacky
yalor... precisely... that is why i say it's ironic why they are making the camera bigger just to attract the "pro" users...
regards,
wacky
will definitely give this a miss.......bigger body? heavier and bigger 12-40?
ill stick to my EM5 and 12-35mm![]()
If your Panasonic 12-35mm f/2.8 is anything like my Panasonic 35-100mm f/2.8, it's a very average lens sold at a very high price. The 12-40mm will likely be better, but the filter size is only 4mm difference (62mm vs 58mm), right?
Actually, I think the 12-35 is optically better than the mediocre 35-100.
Actually, I think the 12-35 is optically better than the mediocre 35-100.
the 12-35 is definitely sharper than the 35-100. i rented a 35-100 to try once cos i was thinking of buying it.....optically the 12-35 was sharp throughout with some softness at the corners. the 35-100 was just....meh.
just saying that as a current EM5 owner, the features in terms of focus points and focus system and new image processing seems great but i wont be spending 1k upgrading to it.