Official Plane Spotting Thread III


nice close up shots seii7, 800mm, Wow ! did you shot from your balcony ?
 

I feel its difficult to use,
-too heavy to handheld
-movement restricted if tripod mounted
-another hand needed to do focus
-angle eyepiece plus narrow field of view makes it hard to aim.
Thank you for the helpful insights, Seii7. It was informative to say the least.

You must be using the Samyang or one of its many re-branded (Bower, Pro-Optic, Rokinon, Vivitar, Walimex etc. etc.) 800mm mirror lens. They are all optically similar to the 1250mm Celestron C5 spotting scope based on the Schmidt-Cassegrain reflector design principle, whereas the 1250mm Celestron C90 MAK spotting scope is based on the Maksutov-Cassegrain reflector design principle but are all essentially Cassegrain "mirror lens" so as to speak. The eyepiece can be remove and a camera connected directly behind (also known as the prime focus imaging) with the assistance of a T-mount adapter and a T-mount ring just like the Samyang 800mm mirror lens.

800mm on a APS-C crop sensor will resulting in a 35mm equivalent focal length of approximately 1280mm, I imagine it will be an effort to handhold without image blurring due to magnified vibrations from camera shake regardless of its size and weight.

:)

not exactly a digiscope but have a 800mm mirror
never got to use til it grew some fungus, few weeks back after returning overseas took some time to diy clean.
share some shots taken after that, pardon the dust, didn't do a good cleaning job.











Anyway its not easy to use, these are the few that can share cos the rest are mostly OOF
Many thanks for the effort to share those images, Seii7. Actually I was pleasantly surprised by the image quality, it was for some reason better that what I will anticipate.

Have you tried it in the Terminal 1 viewing gallery where it will be much easier to focus or pre-focus, does it have enough reach for subjects at SIAEC hangers and those touching down on RWY 20L? Can always add an additional Samyang 2x teleconverter for a 35mm equivalent focal length of approximately 3200mm on a APS-C crop sensor. :bsmilie:
 

You must be using the Samyang or one of its many re-branded (Bower, Pro-Optic, Rokinon, Vivitar, Walimex etc. etc.) 800mm mirror lens. They are all optically similar to the 1250mm Celestron C5 spotting scope based on the Schmidt-Cassegrain reflector design principle, whereas the 1250mm Celestron C90 MAK spotting scope is based on the Maksutov-Cassegrain reflector design principle but are all essentially Cassegrain "mirror lens" so as to speak. The eyepiece can be remove and a camera connected directly behind (also known as the prime focus imaging) with the assistance of a T-mount adapter and a T-mount ring just like the Samyang 800mm mirror lens.

800mm on a APS-C crop sensor will resulting in a 35mm equivalent focal length of approximately 1280mm, I imagine it will be an effort to handhold without image blurring due to magnified vibrations from camera shake regardless of its size and weight.

Yes it's samyang mirror 800mm t-mounted and Its back to photography basics like back to olden days using it manually.
Set enough shutter speed and adequate iso, so I just work on keeping one hand steady and another hand focusing.
Since the jets are coming on fix glideslope, it's easier to practice. Can't say the same for air shows though.

Have you tried it in the Terminal 1 viewing gallery where it will be much easier to focus or pre-focus, does it have enough reach for subjects at SIAEC hangers and those touching down on RWY 20L? Can always add an additional Samyang 2x teleconverter for a 35mm equivalent focal length of approximately 3200mm on a APS-C crop sensor. :bsmilie:


Hmmm T1 viewing is probably my last place for spotting, annoyed by the over-enthusiastic spotters with little awareness of surroundings.:(
Will give it a try when I take a break from work someday.

2x teleconverter....... will also try if I'm able to source one.

nice close up shots seii7, 800mm, Wow ! did you shot from your balcony ?

Haha thanks both of your support, looks like I can use it more often:)
 

Simple Plane shoot @ VHHH while waiting for bus to move...


Thai Air A380 / Cathay B777 by slmka, on Flickr
Any chance that we'll see one of those on flight crew orientation and training flights plying the high volume, short-haul BKK / VTBS - SIN / WSSS sector and vice versa which are slotted in during periods of layover between long haul sectors just like their Airbus A340-642 counterparts?
 

Share some quad-power

supposedly one of the early 748 to enter service only to be delivered recently
LX-VCA


came in with an engine howl never heard before…. finally took a photo of it.
RA-82047


"Sure we can"
OO-THA


Enroute on one of the last few Qantas kangaroo route stopping over Changi.
VH-OEB in Australia GP colours



 

Last edited:
Good catch all of it seii7, i like specially RA82047.
 

Can I ask? ...Why on earth are these in the street and candid forum?
This is reportage stuff or maybe even travel, but street or candid ...are you serious?
 

Can I ask? ...Why on earth are these in the street and candid forum?
This is reportage stuff or maybe even travel, but street or candid ...are you serious?

you have only 13 posts, are you serious?
 

I'm coming home
8659339203_d61858f24f_b.jpg
 

Can I ask? ...Why on earth are these in the street and candid forum?
This is reportage stuff or maybe even travel, but street or candid ...are you serious?
Good question. We should first ask ourselves what defines street photography?

Anyway, last time the TS / OP still new. So eeny, meeny, miny, moe and just created the series of threads here not knowing which is the most appropriate gallery sub-forum since the specific genre is rather specialised and somewhat in a grey area generally speaking. Do forgive his ignorance.
 

Last edited:
Good question. We should first ask ourselves what defines street photography?

Anyway, last time the TS / OP still new. So eeny, meeny, miny, moe and just created the series of threads here not knowing which is the most appropriate gallery sub-forum since the specific genre is rather specialised and somewhat in a grey area generally speaking. Do forgive his ignorance.

I closed that other thread. You need to fix this one. I dont know why it should be left up to me when it was your mistake. I feel offended that eeny, meeny, miny, moe is all you think street photography is worth.

This fellow travelled British Airways ...likely aboard a Boeing 787
 

Last edited:
capture the aircraft standing on the street pointing to the sky, didn't ask the pilot to pose for me.


 

Last edited:
I closed that other thread. You need to fix this one. I dont know why it should be left up to me when it was your mistake. I feel offended that eeny, meeny, miny, moe is all you think street photography is worth.

This fellow travelled British Airways ...likely aboard a Boeing 787

ANT_2120.jpg

Boeing 787 passenger

FYI : BA had been intending to take delivery of the first of its 24 Rolls-Royce Trent 1000-powered 787s in May but the grounding of the type in January has left the schedule unclear.:bsmilie:
I am sure this fellow never travelled on a BA B787.:bsmilie:
 

Last edited:
FYI : BA had been intending to take delivery of the first of its 24 Rolls-Royce Trent 1000-powered 787s in May but the grounding of the type in January has left the schedule unclear.:bsmilie:
I am sure this fellow never travelled on a BA B787.:bsmilie:

The Qantas 787 grounding earlier this year was big news here. The first flight to Oz was cancelled because of it. But then what do I know, not really a airplane photographer ...more a street photographer. I have got heaps more pics of passengers though, maybe some even flew on a Qantas concorde.
 

I closed that other thread. You need to fix this one. I dont know why it should be left up to me when it was your mistake. I feel offended that eeny, meeny, miny, moe is all you think street photography is worth.

This fellow travelled British Airways ...likely aboard a Boeing 787
Dear oneANT,

I can understand your intention(s) for shall I say, deliberate attempts at provoking an elicit response and trolling? But not to worry though, we'll not blame you for it in anyway nor take it to heart personally as we are all really friendly and mature here.

As you have just read from erkuan's (an avid military aviation photographer just like some of us, whose deep interest in the specific category obviously doesn't fall under the genre of "travel") prior posting that British Airways (BAW) has yet to operate the Boeing 787, it's really simply just what we do in here - sharing and learning. Cheers.

P.S. For those with no idea what's happening or going on, do refer to this thread for more details and information. Thank you.
 

But then what do I know, not really a airplane photographer

That's excellent. Saves the trouble of distinguishing between the brutish mass making an incredible racket, spewing hot air, and the aircraft.



Aussie Aussie Aussie! Oi oi oi!
 

Dear oneANT,

I can understand your intention(s) for shall I say, deliberate attempts at provoking an elicit response and trolling? But not to worry though, we'll not blame you for it in anyway nor take it to heart personally as we are all really friendly and mature here.

As you have just read from erkuan's (an avid military aviation photographer just like some of us, whose deep interest in the specific category obviously doesn't fall under the genre of "travel") prior posting that British Airways (BAW) has yet to operate the Boeing 787, it's really simply just what we do in here - sharing and learning. Cheers.

P.S. For those with no idea what's happening or going on, do refer to this thread for more details and information. Thank you.

No, no trolling about it. I'm in the street photography forum. I'm a street photographer afterall. I must point out that in
street photography we have subsets as well, You well know this. We don't have military as a subset, let alone aircraft spotting.

Further to this your mistake has lost me an opportunity to post an interview with a well known street photographer. He saw the forum as you did when you made the mistake of posting this thread here, as

So eeny, meeny, miny, moe and just created the series of threads here not knowing which is the most appropriate gallery sub-forum since the specific genre is rather specialised and somewhat in a grey area generally speaking. Do forgive his ignorance.

You also had the thread THAT I CLOSED, opened again so that you could change your tone and turn this nasty.
Its obvious you have no regard for the street photographers in this forum, now it seems you flaunt the rules as well. You must also make members here aware that I wrote to you in the PM's but that you replied here in the forums and you had that (MY) closed thread (THAT I CLOSED) opened again.

It is obvious you made a mistake posting to this forum, everyone here with their silly excuses knows this. Then to attempt to suggest that plane spotting is somehow street is absurd.
This is as close as you'll get in this foolish definition ...


And then as plane spotters to attempt re-educating a street photographer and redefining street as if you think all of us don't know what it is. You seem to have no regard for truth and worst still for admitting mistake.
I don't care to write to you anymore.

You should simply close this thread and move it to travel
...you are afterall a subset of travel, even the military have to travel.

All this and for what, for your want of care.

Ant.
ɹǝʇʇods ǝuɐld ɐ ʇou
oneant.com.au
 

Back
Top