Am I doing something wrong or missing something ?:dunno:
I often see snaps that I admire on these fora but the posters do not often give details ( camera + lens + f-stop + shutter + ISO , post processing, etc ). These kind of details are really useful for some of us to learn how to get the same kind of quality. E.G. If a photo has been taken at f2.8 1/250th 300mm with a Canon L series lens on a D1 body I know I'm not going to get the same kind of sharpness from my rig !
I have tried "Save as" then examining with Windows Photo Gallery ( and other apps ) but EXIF data is rarely present.
Am I doing something wrong or is it normal for such details to be omitted ? If so, can I make a plea for posters to try to supply such info whenever possible ? Please !!!
I often see snaps that I admire on these fora but the posters do not often give details ( camera + lens + f-stop + shutter + ISO , post processing, etc ). These kind of details are really useful for some of us to learn how to get the same kind of quality. E.G. If a photo has been taken at f2.8 1/250th 300mm with a Canon L series lens on a D1 body I know I'm not going to get the same kind of sharpness from my rig !
I have tried "Save as" then examining with Windows Photo Gallery ( and other apps ) but EXIF data is rarely present.
Am I doing something wrong or is it normal for such details to be omitted ? If so, can I make a plea for posters to try to supply such info whenever possible ? Please !!!