It is 1.3 crop factor of dx format sensor and not 1.3 of full frame, if I m not mistaken....
It is based on dx format. Hence it's 1.5 x 1.3 = 1.95. Which is very close to 2x cropped factor.
Nikon D7100 Hands-On Preview
- Thread starter jasonlel
- Start date
It is based on dx format. Hence it's 1.5 x 1.3 = 1.95. Which is very close to 2x cropped factor.
This is an awesome read!
La Fontaine
New Member
I have stopped looking at new cameras and considering upgrading. Each new camera is a small incremental upgrade from the previous model. The reviewers would make it sound like a big leap forward.
I would rather concentrate on upgrading my skills and shoot more and learn more. My present camera is already more than good enough for my needs
I would rather concentrate on upgrading my skills and shoot more and learn more. My present camera is already more than good enough for my needs
Blur Shadow
Senior Member
La Fontaine said:
There have been revolutionary changes by Nikon of late. Some examples include:
Nikon D80 -> Nikon D90
Nikon D200 -> Nikon D300
Nikon D2xs -> Nikon D3
Nikon D3 -> Nikon D3s
There has also been new ground established, with the creation of the:
Nikon D700
Nikon D800
Nikon D600
You can't expect things to keep making quantum leaps forever, and there would be some iterations where changes are more evolutionary. That doesn't make it bad.
For example, many dismissed the Nikon D300s as a minor upgrade. Sure, if you have a D300, you wouldn't bother. But I got myself a D300s, because I was moving up from a D70.
A company's decision for their product mix hinges on their appeal to the various groups of consumers within each market segment. I'd think many D3xxx, D5xxx and Dx0 users will appreciate the Nikon D7100.
True, true. But often when a person's fingers are itchy, they press the atm rather than the camera button.
avsquare
Senior Member
HERE COMES THE D7000 DUMPING!
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/buy-...-wtsell-dslr-nikon-d7000-body-cheap-$750.html
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/buy-...-wtsell-dslr-nikon-d7000-body-cheap-$750.html
avsquare
Senior Member
New low! $700 :bsmilie:
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/buy-sell-nikon-equipment/1228634-wtsell-dslr-nikon-d7000.html
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/buy-sell-nikon-equipment/1228634-wtsell-dslr-nikon-d7000.html
diediealsomustdive
Senior Member
avsquare said:
70k shutter count...
They press the atm for the new camera button.
avsquare
Senior Member
La Fontaine
New Member
That means 3k a month, 36k a year and just slight over 2 year, you get 70k.....
What is the computed shutter life of the D7000 again?
diediealsomustdive
Senior Member
La Fontaine said:
Nothing against this, but this is one well used camera that i won't buy for seven hundred dollars. Hobbyist bodies might be 10-15k in 2 years, serious shooter 30-40k, estimated. But 70k means a really well used camera. The shutter may last many more shots, but I'm not likely to want such a body.
Blur Shadow
Senior Member
diediealsomustdive said:
I am just guessing, but I have been noticing a lot of photographers using CH as their default mode, and ending up with 5 frames of (what is most likely) near identical photos each time they wish to capture something. (I won't comment on such style of shooting)
If the seller is truly things this way, 3000 / 5 = 600 "real" shots per month, or 600 incidences worth taking photos of. That doesn't sound too bad.
Also, if the camera is confined to studio work, it should not be too bad either.
I note that my 1 year old Nikon D7000 has not crossed the 10k barrier yet, so the seller has used his / her D7000 more than 7 times over my usage.
Last edited:
avsquare
Senior Member
I know what you mean. I have seen people posting a whooping album of hundreds of photos where like at least 1/3 of them looks repeated and worse, out of focus.. some even have eyes blinking or closed LOL :bsmilie:
Blur Shadow
Senior Member
avsquare said:
Maybe they want to combine them all to a gif file. Apparently, it was pretty cool to do so some time ago! Haha!
Similar threads
