sykestang
Senior Member
Yup... another flower using the AF80-200 f/2.8D ED...leonzhu said:this is the end of the beginning... but hardly the beginning of the end.

Yup... another flower using the AF80-200 f/2.8D ED...leonzhu said:this is the end of the beginning... but hardly the beginning of the end.
Nope... not intentional as much as I hope it was. In fact I was trying to focus on the ant running in and out from the core of the bigger front flower :embrass: (not sure whether you guys can make out the ant)... Maybe in this regards, the 70-200VR may perform better ;psehsuan said:sykestang, seems like the focus is on the flower in the background, further from the camera. was that intentional?
the dark background doesn't seem to speak much for the lens, i'm sorry to say.
sykestang said:Nope... not intentional as much as I hope it was. In fact I was trying to focus on the ant running in and out from the core of the bigger front flower :embrass: (not sure whether you guys can make out the ant)... Maybe in this regards, the 70-200VR may perform better ;p
Anyway I will be doing a series of CHIJMES soon with my 80-200... Hope that would really bring out the beauty of the 80-200.... So do watch out for it. ;p
Beachboy said:the above picture taken with trypot ??? :think:
sykestang said:Hey Beachboy... understand that you have a 80-200 lens also... any pics to share?![]()
copycat said:yah i would like to see some sample too
sykestang said:Nope... not intentional as much as I hope it was. In fact I was trying to focus on the ant running in and out from the core of the bigger front flower :embrass: (not sure whether you guys can make out the ant)... Maybe in this regards, the 70-200VR may perform better ;p
Beachboy said:Sometimes i get dissapoint because lots of my picture is blur![]()
its very hard to take picture with handheld even this lens is at F2.8
thinking of upgrade to 70-200vr :think: :think: :think: :think:
Beachboy said:Sometimes i get dissapoint because lots of my picture is blur![]()
its very hard to take picture with handheld even this lens is at F2.8
thinking of upgrade to 70-200vr :think: :think: :think: :think:
CAMEDIA said:waaa u all not sianz carry such a heavy lense ar? The 70-200mm VR looks super cool but after carry around for 20 mins, me sianz liow. :sweat: :sweat: I still like the weight of the 75-300mm, not too heavy and not too light. Maybe I getting old liow. :angel:
How long u can all carry the lens + your setup around (2 kg? 3kg?) without any tripod? 1-2 hrs? :think:
Beachboy said:Sometimes i get dissapoint because lots of my picture is blur![]()
its very hard to take picture with handheld even this lens is at F2.8
thinking of upgrade to 70-200vr :think: :think: :think: :think:
sehsuan said:um... seems like grossly out of focus leh. doing macro shot using the lens? maybe you want to check your diopter setting first. that's the only thing i paranoid about my camera... :sweat:
beach boy...Beachboy said:Sometimes i get dissapoint because lots of my picture is blur![]()
its very hard to take picture with handheld even this lens is at F2.8
thinking of upgrade to 70-200vr :think: :think: :think: :think: