Nikon 70-200 AFS-VR 2.8 vs 80-200 AFS 2.8

[KNIGHT ONG]

They still haven't give up ...

This thread got bigger and bigger pictures to show off ah .. ;p

 

[gadrian]

nice pics :thumbsup:

but..dont tell me u all still discussing on this lens vs lens thingy...chiongheizzz ah...:faint:

Haha.. well.. at least you can enjoy the images.. hehe.. maybe you can contribute to it too..

 

[sykestang]

Here's mine using AF 80-200D f/2.8 ED ;p

 

[gadrian]

Hehe.. some nice work there.. come come.. more more..

 

[hackie]

ok.. here's my take..
think i'm onli 1 of the few bo liao pple who owned the AFd, AF-S, AF-S VR and as well as sigma 70-200 hsm.. :sweat:

i think tat all the 3 nikon lenses are wonderful and versatile performers, frm macro (need to stack extension tube or closeup filter), to portraits, to sports and wildlife(limited, even with teleconvertors).. adding of teleconvertors still gives good results, especially for nikkor 1.4x.. had tried wif kenko pro 300 2x, which produced slightly softer images wif a bit of CA.. otherwise, CA is really non-existance if u r using the lens alone. however, the AFd suffers lose of AF speed when using wif teleconvertors or extension tubes..

anyway, u wldn't go wrong wif any 1 of these babies~~~ :lovegrin:

Nikon AF Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED-IF

Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED-IF

 

[gadrian]

hackie.. cool.. thanks for sharing..

 

[jOhO]

shooting myself.. hehe..

We're all proud of our hand-holding prowess and like to brag about how we once took a sharp photograph hand-held at 1/15 second with a 200 mm lens in a windstorm from a rocking boat while suffering from seasickness. - George Lepp

mauhahahahahahahaha

oh damn.. i just burst out laffing in the middle of the office early in the morning... VERY embarassing.. :embrass: :sweatsm: :sweatsm: :sweatsm:

 

[Beachboy]

mmm anybody have the link to website which will show how the VR works and the internal part on the 70-200 VR ..

i have search and search the website still cant find

only found this for the lens construction ... Now i know that this lens have total of 21 optical lens. :bigeyes:

 

[gadrian]

mmm anybody have the link to website which will show how the VR works and the internal part on the 70-200 VR ..

i have search and search the website still cant find

only found this for the lens construction ... Now i know that this lens have total of 21 optical lens. :bigeyes:

Try this.. this is the optical design of the VR on the 80-400.. almost identical..

VR Tech design

 

[sehsuan]

interesting link there, gadrian

 

[Beachboy]

Try this.. this is the optical design of the VR on the 80-400.. almost identical..

VR Tech design

Very good link .. that i wat i wan

any more ?


that make me more and more like this lens

 

[sehsuan]

i wat i wan

huh? must be a new catchphrase. Beachboy, relax, i'm just as excitable as you

 

[Beachboy]

huh? must be a new catchphrase. Beachboy, relax, i'm just as excitable as you

haha i mean "that is what i wan"

for me i still conside first, cause my hand shake when use 80-200 w/o tripot.
and i dun really like to bring a tripot cause the camera + lens already heavy

so how about you ? when wan to get ?

 

[sehsuan]

so how about you ? when wan to get ?

paiseh ah, i'm using the White Side 70-200 IS

 

[Beachboy]

paiseh ah, i'm using the White Side 70-200 IS

haha i nevernotice that :embrass:


;p :bsmilie:

 

[sehsuan]

dont need to concern yourself about the lens first. find out what you want to shoot first, then go for the lens if they are required to produce the shots you want to get.

 

[Ansel]

Here's mine using AF 80-200D f/2.8 ED ;p

Tang, all these cemetary pix, are you saying we should end this thread?

 

[gadrian]

Tang, all these cemetary pix, are you saying we should end this thread?

The beginning of the end?

 

[sehsuan]

The beginning of the end?

how about, "the beginning is the end is the beginning of the end" or something close like Smashing Pumpkin's confusing song title?

 

[leonzhu]

how about, "the beginning is the end is the beginning of the end" or something close like Smashing Pumpkin's confusing song title?

this is the end of the beginning... but hardly the beginning of the end.