Hello... Need your advice..
I was thinking which camera to camera to get. New Fuji F200EXR or used Nikon D40. Actually I just sold my F100 yesterday to get F200 but when I saw a used Nikon D40 is around the same price, I was so tempted. Now I'm stuck between the 2.
One is the lowest end of all DSLR, one is the king of premium PnS.
I sold my F100 cos I outgrew it. So I thought of F200 as it has more functions to let me play for a longer time. Then again, experts always say even the lowest end of DSLR can beat a highest end PnS.
How?.... Can give me some advice?
-- April
I used to have Lumix FX01 which was infamous during it's time and use to take photos of my newborn.
Thereafter, when he gets older and starts to move more, I will get blur images at about 80% of the time and do not use flash as dun want to irritate his eyes and high ISO was rubbish.
So I changed to Fuji F50fd which was also another hotcakes at that time when it was launched.
Definitely I enjoyed the high iso, up till 800 only max, however I still do get blur images of about 70% of the time esp when my boy moves a lot. So I then tried out the flash (slow synchro) which is very good, it nicely lit up the subject while retain the background. Not like other PNS which will normally blown the subject overly exposed and background is totally black! Video quality is normal and can be jerky and noisy in low-lit situations.
Was using the F50 for quite sometime, about 1yr plus before I switched to Canon 870IS which was another product success at that time. Although it is very clean and sharp up (better than FX01 and F50fd IMO) till ISO400, anything above that is useless except with flash and slow synchro flash was also useless as the shutter speed is set too low and always get blur image. However, the video quality of Canon is nothing but SUPERB!!! It even outshine my JVC videocam man!!!
So no choice as my boy gets older and starts walking and running, I needed something fast and with good quality. So jumped into the DSLR bandwagon and got myself a Sony A300. (Yes, a Sony DSLR which was to my surprise as well as I was initially aiming for Canon 450D or Nikon D90). It's Liveview AF and tilting LCD was the main reason why I chose it.
From there on, I have never regretted my decision and the only regret is having buying DSLR too late which caused me to lose all the good quality pictures which time cannot be reversed now!!! Hit rate is about 80-90% sharp images!!!
I always make it a point to bring my DSLR whenever I have any outings with my family so that all memorable moments are captured in good quality. Of course, as some brothers has mentioned, DSLR route will make you spend more, which I have now 5 lens in dry cabinet...and I dun think it will stop here....:sweat:
In summary, I think Fuji is quite good for a PNS camera, you will certainly enjoy the high ISO capability (of course outbeat by any DSLR), and especially the slow syncro flash (or they call it the intelligent flash) which works well.
I certainly hope they can improve on their video quality (though a bit sad its not HD), as this is the only feature I look for in buying a pns now.
I may sell off my Canon 870IS to get F200 instead....:devil:
I have seen some brothers mentioned before, it's better to get noisy images which can be removed or reduced using PP than to have blur images that are totally useless and opportunity lost!!!
(Apologies for my long winded post, just want to share my true experience)...:angel: