I'm looking for a phone upgrade and the downloads available at my wimp and fancy ( regardless if I need them ) is a big draw.
I constantly download stuff off the Android market at a whim too. I don't need 300,000 apps when I'll use at most 20-30.
I'm looking for a phone upgrade and the downloads available at my wimp and fancy ( regardless if I need them ) is a big draw.
Which phone model has all the features you mentioned? :think:
Video conferencing on mobile phone has been around for a very long time. The problem was, the telco charge it quite expensive (though is cheaper now, but I think, may has forgotten about it).
Though I don't have the full details of how Apple does this, but I suspect it will be done differently and base on proprietary standard. Since, I doubt Apple wants to face another legal case about patent problem again. Meaning, this will be an Apple to Apple video call, while we have video call function across different handset for years.
aiyo, why get so worked up? Really nothing fancy what. The video conferncing function is already available on Sony ericssson phone. Apple found that it is a big thing and call it FaceTime. What a name??
You work for Apple? How much does apple pay you to speak for them?
Ps. I'm using the iPhone to reply this post![]()
I think it's because they claim to be the innovators and pioneers while in fact they're just playing catch-up.
being an innovator is ok... you take some existing feature/function and improve on it.
as for the pioneer thing... i'm not sure how true this is. but if Apple is just playing catch-up and labelled themselves as pioneers... wouldn't they be sued for delivering false information? i don't think Steve would be that stupid to mention this publicly in the WWDC right?
I think Samsung galaxy S is better than this iPhone 4 in a way.![]()
Today ST Digital Life.![]()
I constantly download stuff off the Android market at a whim too. I don't need 300,000 apps when I'll use at most 20-30.
being an innovator is ok... you take some existing feature/function and improve on it.
as for the pioneer thing... i'm not sure how true this is. but if Apple is just playing catch-up and labelled themselves as pioneers... wouldn't they be sued for delivering false information? i don't think Steve would be that stupid to mention this publicly in the WWDC right?
I'm looking at from the angle of selecting 20-30 apps from 300,00 against selecting 20-30 apps from 30,000. Though I agreed that I woun't need all 300,00 apps, but it's there should I want it![]()
Today ST Digital Life.![]()
SINGAPORE: Apple has unveiled its latest generation of iPhone in the US.
But consumers in Singapore will have to wait a little longer before it hits the stores here.
The three telcos, M1, SingTel and StarHub say they expect to offer iPhone 4 in the coming months.
The device is expected to retail at 199 US dollars when it is launched in the US.
It is not immediately clear how much iPhone 4 would cost in Singapore.
But analysts say it will be priced close to the current iPhone 3GS model, which could cost up to S$658 or S$668, depending on the different subscription plans offered by the three telcos.
Market watchers also believe Apple will offer the new iPhone to all the telcos, steering away from the exclusive-deal business model.
This will help the company achieve higher sales volume to regain market share from Google's Android phones.
Industry reports say that the Android is slowly taking over Apple's position in the smartphone market.
In the first quarter this year, the Android sold five million units in the US compared to Apple's eight million.
Analysts expect the local take-up rate of the iPhone 4 to be healthy.
One in three smartphones taken up in Singapore is an iPhone.
Apple will stagger the release dates of iPhone 4 in July for 18 countries and August for 24 countries.
yeah well, sounds like mac versus pc, just that now apple has more options for once. :bsmilie::bsmilie:
no lar, not Mac Vs PC war lar, just wanting to upgrade and am looking around when the G4 lost phone came out so though I'll wait a while![]()
Telcos charge the same for a video call as a normal call. The main problem was that you looked like an idiot if you were on a video call. You had to use the speakerphone (hard to hear) and you walked around holding the phone to your face.
ATM, the apple video calls are apple to apple only, not the already-existing, open standard. This means the telcos can charge you extra $$$ for the apple video calls, while the rest of the world gets the normal rate.