night86mare
Deregistered
no one looking at motorola milestone?
i heard it's pretty popular in the us
i heard it's pretty popular in the us
would u guys get an iphone or a blackberry??? I'm trying to decide between the 2![]()
no one looking at motorola milestone?
i heard it's pretty popular in the us
That's called the Droid here, probably because it's CDMA instead of GSM. It's on the biggest carrier and it is fairly popular, though most who have it probably wanted an iPhone and didn't want to change carriers.
would u guys get an iphone or a blackberry??? I'm trying to decide between the 2![]()
i see, i think it's a real viable alternative.
i think other than CDMA versus GSM the main problem with the GSM version is that it doesn't have google maps loaded? not that i plan to use the phone as a mapping device anyways, but it'd have been nice.
anyways, open mind, will try both and see which one is better..![]()
At least in S'pore, you have a smaller area and 3 carriers. You should have perfect reception everywhere, although I know that it doesn't work that way.
When I had my Samsung A900 in 2006 on Sprint's 3G/EV-DO network, with much of any usage, I'd need to charge the battery. Part of the problem was the big display and the other part was the 3G data hardware. After I got the extended battery, it lasted about 50 % more.
It was actually quite good as a 3G modem and I could run for 6 hours in that mode, but talking and surfing the web and play Java games sucked battery power completely in 2-3 hours. The second battery was handy. My third 3G phone, an LG Lotus, is much more efficient with only a slightly bigger battery.
As the EVO is the first of its kind (a WiMAX device) in the U.S.A., I expect the same kind of demand on the battery as the A900 was. Given that it was 3 years between the phones, I'd be surprised if WiMAX or HSPA+ or LTE phones would be efficient until 2013 or 2014.
Isn't it always a problem being the first?
Just thinking out loud and I know that this happen even with Apple products, if they all know that the first model's batteries suc* big time, why do they not fix it first but wait for future models? To sell more phones? :dunno:
For 1 thing, better performance is possibly a result of technological advancement over the years. What you can achieve now may not be possible at reasonable cost in the past.
For the other thing, it could be like what Bill Gates does.. DOS 1, DOS 2, ......... when DOS 5 is released, he already owns a private plane.......... :bsmilie:
come to think of it, will there be any of those 'invisible beings' following us around when we use those hand phones made in foxconn because of those 'jumps'?![]()
Just thinking out loud and I know that this happen even with Apple products, if they all know that the first model's batteries suc* big time, why do they not fix it first but wait for future models? To sell more phones? :dunno:
you watch too much channel 8 drama lar :bsmilie:
Just thinking out loud and I know that this happen even with Apple products, if they all know that the first model's batteries suc* big time, why do they not fix it first but wait for future models? To sell more phones? :dunno:
you never know... maybe when night time you put the phone beside your bed, and they will stand beside your bed watching you sleep...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
shareholders' expectation. if you don't come out with products on a regular basis... the company's outlook will not be rosy.
But the quility of the products will have to be good, right? Crap products every month will still means crap company.
Anyway, so long as there are people who will buy, though there are short comings which everyone knows will improve in the next model ............... nothing much will change![]()
who cares if the product is crap... you need to be showing the shareholders that you are always on the ball and not those one-hit wonder companies.
just look at MS, Windows is crap but people still buy it :bsmilie: