Virgo
Senior Member
ark19 said:Yar, no prob with my S602Z also :sticktong
![]()
So gothic-looking. Like Zen Zi like that. Sure a :nono: for my models. :sticktong
ark19 said:Yar, no prob with my S602Z also :sticktong
![]()
Max 2.8 said:Date: 26/12/2004, Sunday.
Time: 9.00am (or 10.00am) - to be confirmed by majority. But no later than 10.00am.
Venue: Botanic Gardens
Meeting Point: Vistor's Center (Bt.Timah Entrance)
1. teerex
2. Dennis (Will try to make it and may not be able to stay late as well)
3. Ark19 (Will try to be on time, abit far for me....)
4. vortex
5. Max 2.8(try to make it)
.
.
.
.
10
Note: i can suggest we meet at serene centre MacDonalds...so we can all walk over together. if at MacDonalds...say 930?![]()
teerex said:Pablo, you posted a shot of this same place previously. This one sooooo much better than the previous.
Practice makes perfect huh!
Well done :thumbsup:
Hosea said::bigeyes: oh, but it didn't happened all the time and I am using d70 which is supposed to be suitable for IR.
Virgo said:I'm dying to try different lenses to see, although some of them say it's the sensor of the cam and not related to the lens. I would like to try out and prove them wrong. ;p
And strange for you Hosea, you get this intermittently. Did you try to see if it's due to any specific settings, like shutter speed, aperture or something?
teerex said:Hey Pablo,
It's time you learn some Singlish "Wah, very good leh"
Good to see that you're getting results with the 20D, like Virgo says he envy.
Here's a couple from my today's shoot to share. Appreciate your comments guys.
![]()
![]()
Virgo said:Nice Pablo! Very strange indeed. The 20D suppose to have an anti-IR coating on the sensor. I may be wrong though. I'm dying with envy! :lovegrin:
JohnQ Loi said:Hi Pablo,
wonder if I can have the original to look at. A good chance for me to do catch ... learn, learn, learn.
Pablo said:Hi IR folk,
A question to you all.
How important do you find the CWB to be :dunno:
I am starting to think it is quite important to the outcome.
As such, I think it can effect just how white the leaves etc actually get.
To this point, I am beginning to think that a new CWB needs to be done
everytime you change shot position (in reference to the sun).
Now I may be wrong in this one and I am happy to hear so ....
teerex, the shot you took up the palm tree; did you do a CWB before that shot ?
Has anyone got views on this subject :dunno:
teerex said:That shot was taken with same CWB as for all my shots. I have been using this same CWB for months and for all the shots that I posted.
But I do agree, CWB is important in shooting IR. If possible re-set CWB for every shot as the angle of the sun and shades of green for the tree leaves are different. But I'm too lazy to do that.