This discussion comes up every now and then.
DO HDMI cables make a difference?
YES !
But.....
As a rule of of thumb, for short distances, i.e. 2-3m or less, most cables will suffice. Esp for the small screens most PC or camera enthusiasts use. If you go to the Home Theatre forums, and you use screens around the 80" and larger, small differences in picture quality are easily discernible.
The issue is more of signal dropout over longer distances with cheap cables, and the purity of the signal than the traditional concept of how a cable can make a difference to the sound.
So for casual users who are not using TVs bigger than 50", I would suggest a budget of $10-20/m. You are welcome to use cables up to $100, but I don't think there are that many people here who will go mad over small differences in quality.
But if you are a cinephile, then by all means the sky is the limit, and come read this two links:
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/showthread.php?t=1900362
http://www.xtremeplace.com/yabbse/index.php?topic=85263.0
Cheers.
FYI- for my 50" Full HD plasma, I use an imported cable from monoprice.com which costs about $50 for a 3m stretch. I watch only Hi Definition from my HT set. No issues.
PS: can you tell a difference between difference audio cables - YES. But if you are using a small desktop mini, save your money.
If you are an audiophile and are willing to invest to hear the best, the differences are worth paying for.
Eg: I use a cheap $200 inter-connect for my CD setup, which is about 10k in total budget costs. Happy with the performance, although I have tried a 1k cable that makes a small improvement.
Hi there, for my case, I'm just using a generic hdmi cable for both my PS3 to TV and from PC to TV. Its doesn't make any difference for me. I've tested with my friend's monster cable that cost much much more expensive and I couldn't tell any difference in quality between the 2 cables.
My TV is not a very large one just bout 37" HDTV.
You can refer to the below article.