waileong said:Terence,
You visit PN right? There was a guy called Jay, remember?
I do visit PN but don't hang around the forums much but I have a feeling I know what you mean.
How are the 220 rolls working out?
waileong said:Terence,
You visit PN right? There was a guy called Jay, remember?
student said:Frankly I do not care a S**T about how you or anyone think of me.
I write on points and reasonings.
I do not know you are and I do not care a damn. And if you want me to confirm your status, I will gladly do so. But I have already long decided that you are not worth the time I spend writing this post.
Terence said:I do visit PN but don't hang around the forums much but I have a feeling I know what you mean.
How are the 220 rolls working out?
Terence said:Hehe, I did say they were expired. Anyways you got them for a song and a handshake. Maybe I should have saved them for my Holga.
student said:Please! Are you daft or what?
I was trying to give you some credit to a measure of intelligence as a medical student. You may had scored many "As" in your "A" level, but your line of argument is getting more and more idiotic, to use a very gentle description.
fWord said:Trying to get back on topic...
I'm thinking about getting started in RFs as well. There are the obvious Yashica Electro 35, Olympus XA...Canon G3 QL17, Konica Auto S2 etc. But I ran into a page on rather small RFs such as the Petri 7s and the Petri Color 35. Anyone had any experience with these or heard anything about them?
They don't have any autoexposure functions, so they'll be a bit harder to work. But the allure of this camera is definitely there...not often heard of, seems to be well constructed and is selling for next to nothing on Ebay.
zaren said:i don't think the petri color 35 is selling for next to nothing on ebay. if it is in mint working condition AND selling for next to nothing, grab it!
Pablo said:Having read this and a good number of threads over time,
I have seen many that reply to a question with little or no knowledge on the subject.
To do this is just asking for trouble.
.
pablo, your post seems rather ambiguous. your point is?teckyy said:That's right. They risked being called a "fool", a "f***head", "as*****" and "p*s**d". Add to that, some of the knowledgeable ones "would not give a damn who they are or what they think".
Strong point your got there.
teckyy said:That's right. They risked being called a "fool", a "f***head", "as*****" and "p*s**d". Add to that, some of the knowledgeable ones "would not give a damn who they are or what they think".
Strong point your got there.
fWord said:Perhaps I'm missing something but the Petri 7s seems to better the Color 35 in terms of features...shutter speed range, for example, although the difference is not great.
If they're truly worth as much as you say then they're definitely worth watching! Just hope the will function as a workhorse as well and not just a cute display item.
zaren said:the Petri 7s is better in terms of shutter speed range, but is also larger and 50% heavier than the Petri color 35. Depends which camera features are more important to you.
waileong said:Terence,
You visit PN right? There was a guy called Jay, remember?