With the SSD (solid state drive) moving towards 2TB, see report here, would you prefer to have a built in memory or rather stick to removable media? I hate carrying CF cards because sometimes I even forget to bring them. LOL! What do you think?
With the SSD (solid state drive) moving towards 2TB, see report here, would you prefer to have a built in memory or rather stick to removable media? I hate carrying CF cards because sometimes I even forget to bring them. LOL! What do you think?
Actually, I'd prefer removable... cuz.. the pic have to come out of the cam somehow... unless DSLRs provide sufficient transfer rate, how you do your downstream processess...ie, how you PP your pics...etc..With the SSD (solid state drive) moving towards 2TB, see report here, would you prefer to have a built in memory or rather stick to removable media? I hate carrying CF cards because sometimes I even forget to bring them. LOL! What do you think?
I think wireless will the future way of transferring images.imagine lugging a DSLR just to transfer images to another location.....
There's always the service centre! ;p Go screw them up!Having solid state memory in the camera??
How to replace it if there is a problem?? There have been loads of cases of solid state drives being faulty. Is it worth the risk?
I'd rather have memory cards and just replace them if there is any trouble.
Actually, I'd prefer removable... cuz.. the pic have to come out of the cam somehow... unless DSLRs provide sufficient transfer rate, how you do your downstream processess...ie, how you PP your pics...etc..
unless DSLRs include e-SATAII link to PC.. mabbe can consider.
There's always the service centre! ;p Go screw them up!
I am sure with technological advancements, wireless transfer speed will increase. But for now, it might seem slow. ;p But don't worry, because with Canon, you can. :sweatsm: :bsmilie:Actually, I'd prefer removable... cuz.. the pic have to come out of the cam somehow... unless DSLRs provide sufficient transfer rate, how you do your downstream processess...ie, how you PP your pics...etc..
unless DSLRs include e-SATAII link to PC.. mabbe can consider.
there will always be a gap between wireless transfer speed and cable transfer speed... similar to P&S sensor vs FF sensor... wired transfer speed using optical is already way over wireless standards.I am sure with technological advancements, wireless transfer speed will increase. But for now, it might seem slow. ;p But don't worry, because with Canon, you can. :sweatsm: :bsmilie:
I am sure there will be rigorous MTBF tests done to ensure users ease of mind. I am still using my 3 year old iPod without any problems. I guess if your machine keeps breaking down, you have got yourself a lemon! :bsmilie: Time to wear red undies when buying new gear. :sweatsm:I wouldn't want to visit the service centre time after time over a simple drive issue... this would be more of a hamper than aid...
2TB card can allow me to shoot 1 year liao... shoot and keep, dun even need to transfer... dun even need e-Sata in cam liao.Yup... think its about time the newest DSLR incorporate e-SATA at the very least.
And judging by the way the SDHC format is moving, we may have 1 to 2 terabyte cards sooner than we think!
For the trigger happy 10fps shooter, it might take forever to copy 32GB of images over. LOL!there will always be a gap between wireless transfer speed and cable transfer speed... similar to P&S sensor vs FF sensor... wired transfer speed using optical is already way over wireless standards.
At the rate manufacturers cramming pixels into the cam.. dun tink wireless can catch up... hahaha
wif canon... everyone can... limited to USB2.0 atm.
For people who are looking for integration and convenience, I hope it comes true someday.