It's time for me to upgrade my Panasonic DV camera to this. ;p At the same time I can take great stills with this too. ;p
Haha! Yup i agree with you.
If i'm considering an upgrade from a d80, it will only be the d90 vs d300.
My concerns:
AF - Obviously d300 will be faster 3500 vs 1000... not too keen about the many af points but just the speed of the af using the centre af point.
ISO - SEEMS like the same noise quality control. If it really is, it will be a boon for those looking for a better iso control camera in the nikon family.
Resolution - both the same using the expeed processing. BUT d90 only 12bit vs 14bit of d300...argh!
FPS - 4.5 vs 6...honestly don't require so fast. but 4.5 fps is VERY good!
Handling - I prefer the ligher weight d80 over the d200...so the same can be applied to d90 vs d300.
Shutter lag - believe me or not, but i can feel the difference between a d80 and d200's shutter lag, and when shooting events, the discrepancy is painfully realized. d90 is halfway d80 and d300 :thumbsup:
Viewfinder - 100% on the d300 vs 96% on the d90. Not much diff.
Upgradability - D80 to D90 can resuse the 3rd party batteries, battery grip, SD cards....etc etc...
In all, I really feel that the d90 is a very legitimate upgrade choice for d80 users and for those who wants to move up from the d40/d40x/d60 series and also for those from point and shoots.