Hi all,
Thanks for sharing all your valuable infos and pictures with mi.
Finally i have make up my decision and bought a
.
.
.
.
.
.
D300
Cheers!!!![]()
Err... the D90 *has* a CMOS sensor too, and said to be similar to the sensor from the D300.
There has even been reports that the high ISO performance of the D90 is similar (and a few say better) than the D300.
Guys, or targeted at people who own D300 and D90 or tried it before...
Anyone miss the exquisite 51 AF pts on D300 when he/she used the D90?
considering the lack of 40 AF points ( 1 cross vs 15 cross), anyone have comments on it?
I have the D80 with a similar AF system to the D90. the sheer NUMBER of points is not the only consideration here. I use the D300 with one AF pt at a time on most occasions, In fact, I disable ALL but 11 of the AF points on the D300.
Does this make the D300 AF = D80/D90 AF?
No !!
The D300 tracks MUCH more quickly and MUCH more accurately than the D80/D90, even when just using any ONE AF point.
Get the D300, cmos sensor as compared to ccd, better noise control and think the highest usable photo you can get on D90 is at iso 1600, any higher the noise is unbearable. Pardon for my humble opinions.
huahahhahaha
Hi,
Don't mind if I 'hijack' this thread for some D300 questions. (This is my post in this forum..)
I am thinking of seriously getting into photography for a long time and also thinking of getting the D300.
(a) What is the best (sharp & colour richness) walkaround lens to accompany the D300?
(b) What is the current best price for the D300? Can a $3.5k budget be sufficient for the body and the lens (both brand new)?
Many thanks in advance..
Dan
Why not? Body only going at about $2000. That leaves you with $1500. But don't forget there are still other things to take into consideration when buying a DSLR like Dry Cabinet, Flash System, etc...
So maybe you could try stretching your budget to $4000 and get the combo below?
D300 + 24-70 f/2.8 + SB-800 (Discontinued) + 36L Dry Cab?
Is the 18-200mm VR good enough for the D300, or the combination of 24-70 and 70-200 much more superior?Why not? Body only going at about $2000. That leaves you with $1500. But don't forget there are still other things to take into consideration when buying a DSLR like Dry Cabinet, Flash System, etc...
So maybe you could try stretching your budget to $4000 and get the combo below?
D300 + 24-70 f/2.8 + SB-800 (Discontinued) + 36L Dry Cab?
Is the 18-200mm VR good enough for the D300, or the combination of 24-70 and 70-200 much more superior?
Nah, the 18-200 has something/mechanical flaw which will spoil your camera eventually.
Nah, the 18-200 has something/mechanical flaw which will spoil your camera eventually. If you have the cash start off with maybe a second hand D70 which I saw at peninsula that day for $400 and purchase a 24-70 (brand new/second-hand) + 70-200 (brand new/second-hand).
Den after u have had enough of the D70 upgrade to a brand new D300. Get a hang of the cameras first.
Nah, the 18-200 has something/mechanical flaw which will spoil your camera eventually. If you have the cash start off with maybe a second hand D70 which I saw at peninsula that day for $400 and purchase a 24-70 (brand new/second-hand) + 70-200 (brand new/second-hand).
Den after u have had enough of the D70 upgrade to a brand new D300. Get a hang of the cameras first.
Didn't know the 18-200vr will "spoil my camera eventually"...does it mean i have to change body soon? Please kindly advise KenBit...i'm so worried.
Please quote a reference for this claim?
Pity about the baseless statement on the 18-200 in an otherwise sensible post. Care to substantiate your point about the 18-200? If not please retract as many would be misled by you. Have you owned and know how to properly use this lens?
rajesh