D7000 user...fall in!!!

[tthiang]

was told by a fellow member here that slrr oos alrdy u might have to wait

yes yes, I called, told me no stocks

 

[kirkteo]

70-200mm very ex..... not my aim yet..... 70-300mm still can consider... haha..Well, once there is this teacher who recommended 18-200mm... thats why still thinking..

 

[blurboiboi]

guys for crop bodies.. think sigma and tokina offers the 50-150 and 50-135 F2.8 respectively... why not consider them?.. heard they are good too... its a 70-200 equivalent on FF

 

[Cowseye]

70-200mm very ex..... not my aim yet..... 70-300mm still can consider... haha..Well, once there is this teacher who recommended 18-200mm... thats why still thinking..

There are different schools of thought. I believe the right lens for the right scene. The sigma one is about double the price of the Nikon 70-300mm VR. Save longer for a better glass loh.

 

[pingshen]

guys for crop bodies.. think sigma and tokina offers the 50-150 and 50-135 F2.8 respectively... why not consider them?.. heard they are good too... its a 70-200 equivalent on FF

Second that! using Sigma 50-150 myself and i feel the IQ is tack sharp @50mm and okok @150. furthermore it is light and focus fast!

 

[RB26DETT]

I've got this urge to get the nikkor 17-55, but its mad ex. I believe its about $2000+?

Someone please talk me out of it!!! hahaha

 

[luckyorange]

I've got this urge to get the nikkor 17-55, but its mad ex. I believe its about $2000+?

Someone please talk me out of it!!! hahaha

tamron 17-50? haha can save alot =x

 

[luna_sea83]

I believe the members here only talk ppl into buying and not out of buying it. Hahahahaha

 

[RB26DETT]

I did thought of the tamron, but I've read around, the AFS on the 17-55 is mad fast, and also alot of positives have been given to the nikkor compared to the tamron. Read already very gian!!

 

[spree86]

I did thought of the tamron, but I've read around, the AFS on the 17-55 is mad fast, and also alot of positives have been given to the nikkor compared to the tamron. Read already very gian!!

Haha but you can 3-4 tamrons with one nikkor :bsmilie:

 

[tamkm54]

Hi,All,

I need help,i think i accidently change my camera setting,my camera only capture photo after 2 seconds later when i depressed the shuttle button.
why ? how sld i retify it ?
thx.
Tam.

Did u use the timer mode?
The rotating dial at the top left turn to CH and try..

ok,will try....
thx.

All,
it doesn't help when i switched to CH... my shuttle still close after 1-2 seconds,did anyone know how to solve it ?
thx.

 

[yu jianzhi]

hi use maybe Program mode? and try again ?

or reset the settings on camera

 

[twisted illusion]

All,
it doesn't help when i switched to CH... my shuttle still close after 1-2 seconds,did anyone know how to solve it ?
thx.

is your shuttler speed set to 1-2 secs?
try P mode and shot into bright scene...

 

[yu jianzhi]

All,
it doesn't help when i switched to CH... my shuttle still close after 1-2 seconds,did anyone know how to solve it ?
thx.

give me a call maybe if you can't get it working lol - 92281121

 

[Enjoy]

All,
it doesn't help when i switched to CH... my shuttle still close after 1-2 seconds,did anyone know how to solve it ?
thx.

Dude, u probably have your EXPOSURE DELAY mode set to ON. Switch it OFF.

 

[Enjoy]

Erm may i know what will be the best wide angle lens for landscape (D7000)? Please kindly advice. Thanks in advance.

Tokina 11-16mm F2.8, the best on Nikon DX.

 

[spree86]

Tokina 11-16mm F2.8, the best on Nikon DX.

Well it's the only f2.8 UWA but can consider others too like the sigma 10-20

 

[Nubzz]

70-200mm very ex..... not my aim yet..... 70-300mm still can consider... haha..Well, once there is this teacher who recommended 18-200mm... thats why still thinking..

Tempted for the 70-300 too lolz.. was quoted 700+ for brand new. 70-200 is soo exppp, and heavy.

 

[Cowseye]

Tempted for the 70-300 too lolz.. was quoted 700+ for brand new. 70-200 is soo exppp, and heavy.

It took me a long while to understand y I need a 70-200mm F/2.8. But still can't put my money into getting one.

I had the weight issue too, but after handling birding lens for a while, 70-200mm seems puny

 

[Nubzz]

It took me a long while to understand y I need a 70-200mm F/2.8. But still can't put my money into getting one.

I had the weight issue too, but after handling birding lens for a while, 70-200mm seems puny

Hahaz.. For the subject isolation + bokehlicious effect?

But it's 4 times the price of a 70-300 =_=!