D700... which walk-about lens ???


Status
Not open for further replies.
Sry, I mean the hindu temple. Cos the colour and details is too good liao

shot with vivid colour setting
can be reproduced if the light is right
 

Ah, my office not too far away too. Don't quite have the lunchtime luxury to snap pics though :(
Realise too that all your Hindu temple shots have that brilliant blue sky, quite surreal :)
 

35/2 and 50/1.8 (One lens on camera, one in pocket!)

35-70/2.8 if you can find one - one of the best zooms Nikon has ever made. Much overlooked, especially after APS-C DSLRs took over market.

24-85/2.8-4. Not a bad zoom lens.

28-105/3.5 Mentioned above. Hope you can find one...
 

Ah, my office not too far away too. Don't quite have the lunchtime luxury to snap pics though :(
Realise too that all your Hindu temple shots have that brilliant blue sky, quite surreal :)

go early morning, around 0830,
if the light is right the sky will be blue
 

I bought my D700 with 24-70mm F/2.8G. I thought this is it! Until I carry this around the weekend. Then, I have the exact same question as TS. I spend 2 weeks looking for a lighter alternative. Obviously, 24-120mm VR was my first find! However, after doing more research online, I found the 24-85mm F/2.8-4 ( with 1:2 macro ). I bought it overseas for $790. ( Locally selling for $1090 ). I have been using it for a month now and no turning back. It is a great lens that I will high recommend it to you!
 

Last edited:
I bought my D700 with 24-70mm F/2.8G. I thought this is it! Until I carry this around the weekend. Then, I have the exact same question as TS. I spend 2 weeks looking for a lighter alternative. Obviously, 24-120mm VR was my first find! However, after doing more research online, I found the 24-85mm F/2.8-4 ( with 1:2 macro ). I bought it overseas for $790. ( Locally selling for $1090 ). I have been using it for a month now and no turning back. It is a great lens that I will high recommend it to you!

Hi do you have any photo of the 24-85 shot wide open at 24mmf2.8 & 85mmf4 with 100% crop. I would like to do a comparison with the 28-105mm that I have.... the 28-105mm need to be stop 1 stop to get razor sharp photo, wide open it's a little soft.

Thanks
 

Hi do you have any photo of the 24-85 shot wide open at 24mmf2.8 & 85mmf4 with 100% crop. I would like to do a comparison with the 28-105mm that I have.... the 28-105mm need to be stop 1 stop to get razor sharp photo, wide open it's a little soft.

Thanks

Dig my thread...
85mm http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=392320
28mm http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=392304
50mm http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=392318
35mm http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=392312

You can compare to Sigma 24/1.8 in this thread.
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=392325

24-85 @ 24/2.8
Resized
D3-2485-24_28s.jpg


Centre Crop
D3-2485-24_28cc.jpg


Side crop
D3-2485-24_28sc.jpg
 

Last edited:
24-85 @ 24/5.6
Resized
D3-2485-24_56s.jpg


Centre Crop
D3-2485-24_56cc.jpg


Side crop
D3-2485-24_56sc.jpg
 

The upcoming Sigma 24-70 f2.8 HSM looks promising. I'm not sure about the weight and size though.
 

Sigma's EX coating is always disappointing.

Why does Sigma persist with its EX coating when nobody seems to be appreciative of it? But please correct me if I'm wrong.
 

I am walking with this 2kg.
The official answer is the AFS 24-120 VR. I do not have it so can't comment. Anyone with experience?

from what I read, this lens is overpriced and not sharp enough.
 

I agree with Playlens; I also thot with 24-70 put me to a stop at least for quite a while. This combo is quite heavy to walkabout :sweat: Anyone considering Tamron 28-300mm VC? or using could share your views?

I'm actually quite keen on this Tamron since it's focus length could cover most common range of photography and it's pretty light weight too.

Your comments or review are very much appreciated, TIA.
 

I agree with Playlens; I also thot with 24-70 put me to a stop at least for quite a while. This combo is quite heavy to walkabout :sweat: Anyone considering Tamron 28-300mm VC? or using could share your views?

I'm actually quite keen on this Tamron since it's focus length could cover most common range of photography and it's pretty light weight too.

Your comments or review are very much appreciated, TIA.

The 28-300 Tamron Lens is currently used by Thom Hogan as his "walkabout" lens.

Check out the section "Personal Comment" in his review of the D700. He's got other lens recommendations for different purposes too eg. Landscapes, wildlife,.. etc.

http://www.bythom.com/nikond700review.htm

"Tooling around. When I'm in foreign cities walking around (waiting for the plane that'll take me to wilderness ;~), I need flexible. Right now that's a D700 with a Tamron 28-300mm, which has turned out to be far better optically than I'd expected. Too bad I've got DBS problems with it."

He seems to be getting a dead battery symdrome problem with the D700 and the Tamron 28-300 lens. However, somewhere else on his website, he did mention that he knows of other photographers who do not have the same DBS problem.

Hope this helps you make your final decision!
 

Which walkabout lens...
Really depends on whether your priority is lightweight convenience or good quality shots and large apertures (both for shallow dof and higher shutter speeds).
I shoot with a FX camera (D3) and find the AFS 24-70/208G very useful for most walkabout situations (both indooors and outdoors).
Fred
 

My preference is picture quality. My "walkabout" is therefore D700 + 24-70mm/2.8. No MB-D10 in that combo to save some weight. I even carry the 14-24mm/2.8 in my waist pouch, just in case a situation calls for a fanciful wide-angle ;)
 

Thanks Lord Soth :)

Agreed with sf_kang and originalsin where quality is one of the key concern; just that thinking a lighter lens if I need to walkaround for long. Anyway, I still couldn't decide to get the Tamron or not :confused:
 

from what I read, this lens is overpriced and not sharp enough.

Thanks.

Looks like Nikon will be making a new lens to cover this gap soon, a sharp (ED+Nano, etc) lens for FX with VR, slightly longer range, but it will have smaller aperture than f2.8 (constant f4?) since we want it light for walk-about. Hopefully by December holidays, :)otherwise I will be forced to bring my DX + 18-200 VR. :(
 

Thanks Lord Soth :)

Agreed with sf_kang and originalsin where quality is one of the key concern; just that thinking a lighter lens if I need to walkaround for long. Anyway, I still couldn't decide to get the Tamron or not :confused:

The Tamron 28-75 is much better optically than the Tamron 28-300 lens.

Here's a few samples of my Tamron 28-75 on my D700. This is currently my "walkabout" lens combo. I recommend this Tamron lens because it is optically sharp at f/2.8 at a wide angle of 28mm. It is sharpest at f/4 at all focal lengths. Even at F/4, I could snap a picture (see photo 2 below) without the use of a Flash in low light situations.

It's got the lightweight (500g), small and compact, sharp lens quality and low light capability for a walkabout lens.

Photo 1 - Dragon in Shenton Way
2907070098_19ee351620_b.jpg

-> look out for the Dragon above the Singtel Building!

Photo 2 - Bell in Buddha Tooth Relic Temple Singapore Chinatown
2906214719_fd7058c01a_b.jpg

-> This was taken without Flash. For those who have been to the temple itself, you would be aware that this area is quite dark. This photo is meant to display the low light qualities of the Tamron Lens and the D700...of course!

Photo 3 - Buddha Tooth Relic Temple Singapore Chinatown
2907065776_4b88450fed_b.jpg
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top