I fully support the idea of a publication, be it hard or soft (no double entendres intended!) I know the guys behind GPWeek.com; small workforce - I understand it was 3 people the first year, now 6), it's started by one of the premier F1 photography agencies (
www.sutton-images.com) and it's been built 100% on advertising; weekly delivery during the F1 season (March - November) with URL link send to your email by 5PM Monday every week... they are not going for printed copy as their goal is a well-written publication sent to fans the day after an F1 GP race. I love the fact that it's a e-mag with a viewership of exceeding 100,000 a week that is built via word-of-mouth. However, this is not the main reason for my post.
Related to doing a CS magazine, I first have to ask who is CS? On the home page, when you click "about us" you get a brief history of CS, but no real understanding of who owns it; it states there are 14 founding members, which suggests those 14 own CS, but as there's no registration on the logo (if you can call that a logo...) I question how CS can be a viable publisher. It is great in that it has a well trafficked website and with a reasonable amount of advertising, is probably self-sufficient, but as it seems to be a benevolent entity that exists to provide a platform for it's members (all non-paying), a commercially driven publication in paper on e-ink would seem to be out of sync with what CS is.
So suggesting an alternative - who here is interested in doing a digital / physical magazine that is a free-standing publication?
I suggest a regular e-publication to gauge initial response, and letting everyone know there's a physical end-of-year / Xmas hard copy featuring reader images that will be sold directly to readers, and it'd stay like that through the years: an e-mag supported by advertising with a must-have collectors Xmas issue?
It'd need an angle / USP that would differentiate itself from the rest of the crowd - being Singapore-based is one part of that, but I think it would need to have more style / direction to really form a solid brand for such a magazine. I find the current asian photography magazines to suffer from either being too beholden to their advertisers, writing irrelevant reviews (how many Canon 7D reviews can you dig up and read for free online?) or plain lacking in great 'WOW' images in their pages.
I am willing to put in money and time to see this take off, who here is genuinely serious about making a go of it? When I was studying, I used to listen to a radio station whose tag line was "Less Talk, More Rock" - this thread has hit 3 pages in a day, quicker than 99% of the posts here, so who wants to rock instead of just talking about this?