Carl Zeiss 16-80mm

[Rashkae]

I love this shot!

 

[DewaKarma]

I love this shot!

thks bro..taken in b/w with the cam itself..must try all the modes..the guy i took was from sweden,,he's into underwater photography..

 

[zcf]

yes unless there a typing error in the mag..it 35mm f2.8 stf

That would be great news, hopefully it would be AF, if it's a 35mm f/2.0 it would be even better ;p

 

[pai]

That would be great news, hopefully it would be AF, if it's a 35mm f/2.0 it would be even better ;p

aiyoh. if like that, what would it do to the value of the 35 1.4?

 

[eow]

That would be great news, hopefully it would be AF, if it's a 35mm f/2.0 it would be even better ;p

aiyoh. if like that, what would it do to the value of the 35 1.4?

the question will we able to afford them in the first place.....:cry:

 

[pai]

eat grass lor. plus sell off some of the collection... recently i look at the dry cabinet... thinking some of this stuff never exercise for so long... :embrass:

 

[tankm]

Thanks bro...yours not bad either. Like the B&W as well.

ahhh...nice pics bro...ive yet to test fully yet coz send my cam for servicing...

 

[eesteck]

100% crop:

double confirm, sure no pp???:bigeyes: this is totally diff result fr those web review pictures i seen. base on these few samples, i must agree good lens:thumbsup:

 

[Rashkae]

double confirm, sure no pp???:bigeyes: this is totally diff result fr those web review pictures i seen. base on these few samples, i must agree good lens:thumbsup:

Absolutely no PP on that crop. Seriously, on some of the shots, I can see the tiny hair on her skin too...

 

[raincool2005]

BUY BUY BUY ! :lovegrin:

 

[raincool2005]

.. the power of Carl Zeiss ! :thumbsup:

 

[ihunk]

.. the power of Carl Zeiss ! :thumbsup:

OMG!! :heart: :thumbsup: :heart: :thumbsup:

 

[raincool2005]

any more ?

 

[Rashkae]

any more ?

Sure:

 

[sulhan]

Sure:

I think the 2nd shot would have been better with slight underexposure and then PP for brghtening of areas outside the face. The current shot showed face seem to be washed out.

 

[Rashkae]

I think the 2nd shot would have been better with slight underexposure and then PP for brghtening of areas outside the face. The current shot showed face seem to be washed out.

The second shot has no PP. Still cleaning up my shots.

 

[Eyesthruthelens]

Review on this lens..

http://www.dyxum.com/columns/articles/lenses/SAL-1680CZ/Carl-zeiss-16-80-SAL-1680CZ_review.asp

 

[raincool2005]

any more ? would like to see some indoor shots.

 

[raincool2005]

http://www.dyxum.com/dforum/forum_posts.asp?TID=11663

:think:

 

[Johnston]

newbie question here, heard from a bro here, mentioning that this CZ lens cannot be used on FF cam. why huh? :think: