standingup
Member
The AA filter is to avoid color aliasing and moires. Er..for Canon , we often use Unsharp Mask in the Post process. Well, it actually gives us more room to play with the sharpness of photos..
He already stated in the title that only his is not perfect.you guys react like I'm proclaiming all 5Ds to be faulty. c'mon the tread title was just a bit sarcastic, that's all. I know its a great camera, I just was unlucky to get a bad copy, thats all.
For your info, I am not buying it... I was testing it and Canon lent me one 5D, 580 and 50mm f1.2 lens. I will buy them if it fits my requirement.
1D series is a great series camera... but seems like I have bad experience with 5D with them not providing me with the stupid manual and ASSUME i know.
I think we are seriously OT here... the point is, Canon system is great!! great lens... but not very intuitive camera body to use (at least for me).
Anyway, I know what I need to do now... and where to spend my $$$ on next.
Hart
My personal experience is that pictures straight out of Canon DSLR aren't great. If you do post processing, it's a very very very good system - Just look at the EF lens range and I think all the 3rd parties have a lens with EF mount.
Personally, I had bad experience with this camera too... this is not the easiest camera to use and semi automatic mode with flash is pretty bad for its consistency. No wireless flash, no IS on 50mm... what I am going to do with it?
Of course. Image quality is great, but other than that, it is not such a pleasure camera to use...
That is my opinion... feel free to trash my opinion, nonetheless, if I am paying for $4000 for a camera, I expect to be a little bit better than this. :angry:
Hart
Hi, I think it also depends on the JPEG workflow tools used. Some such as the DPP software bundled in apply a modest amount of sharpening by default. Thus, straight out of camera, but imported through a suitable image management/workflow software, is quite acceptable.
I personally use Apple Aperture and capture in RAW. The sharpness of images (after Aperture's RAW conversion) is excellent. The only adjustments required are minor exposure/WB corrections.
oh do we love CS thread wars.
They are better than Chinese drama serials. Online wayang.
haha.
this post is actually positive about the canon brand on the whole since the "faulty" camera was replaced......granted it was new and QC should have picked it up.
All things aside the lesson learned here is that if this was grey market or used the result would be somewhat more costly and so the advice to heed as stated is "test it if at all possible if you are a savvy user or get someone who would pick these things up to assist"
My office just spent 50k on a new HD broadcast cam from SONY and after the footage was given to me I noticed 3 pixels were blown on the ccd. In this particular case it was an alignment issue and was easily solved.
My point is - don't flog this or try defend Canon. $hit happens in this industry and the warranty is just an insurance policy.
Canon owner
oh do we love CS thread wars.
They are better than Chinese drama serials. Online wayang.
haha.
Not trying to be funny here, but I think we (as in, everyone) should learn to control our emotions properly and look at things (threads) objectively. We are adults. Everyone is entitled to their opinion so thread wars are kind of silly.![]()