Ryonpepper
New Member
pics 2,4,6 by 70-200mm VR? 
AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED
- Thread starter sp0iltbr4t
- Start date
- Status
tripod mount and fired with ML 3.
pics 2,4,6 by 70-200mm VR?
no one got all right:dunno:
seems like 70-300 is a good buy.:bsmilie:
Scaglietti
New Member
2,4,6 is by 70-300VR?
itsybitsyspidy
New Member
i mean u shot all those with the same settings right? hmmmmm :think: 1,3,5 70-200?
:bsmilie:
2,4 and 5 are shot with 70-200
as u can see clearly, these pics are sharper.(yes...LOOK carefully).
both lens shot with VR on,normal.
so, is the 70-300 'worth' it?
well, it's good enough for me.considering i dun do pixel peep(i just learn this term recently)
still want me test somemore over the weekends?
2,4 and 5 are shot with 70-200
as u can see clearly, these pics are sharper.(yes...LOOK carefully).
both lens shot with VR on,normal.
so, is the 70-300 'worth' it?
well, it's good enough for me.considering i dun do pixel peep(i just learn this term recently)
still want me test somemore over the weekends?
controlled lightings?
bludder,i'm only a novice.
and i havent bought my studio lights.
zac08
Senior Member
No need studio lights lah... just simple direct or indirect lighting. Table lamps will do well.
And use tripods to ensure consistency of test.
No need studio lights lah... just simple direct or indirect lighting. Table lamps will do well.
And use tripods to ensure consistency of test.
ok.if i have the mood,i'll do.
but maybe not in my house.i dont wanna reveal too much details.
is sgp arts musuem open to photography?
jnet6
Senior Member
Thanks for the pics.
Yes indeed the 70-300VR is good enough for normal ppl that doesn't see "pixels". :bsmilie:
If you have time...
maybe you can try out the following focal length 70,105,200.
one set at the widest aperture.
another set at F5.6.
ok.let me c if i wake up and i have the mood.
actually,i'm more interested in my ML 3 than the 70-300.it's really FUN to fire remotely!:bsmilie:
i dont have a 1.4TC.i only have the 1.7TC II which WILL NOT fit the 70-300.
i tried it liao.
it harder to do shoot in controlled lighting for such a lens..VR lens arent that sharper for any aperature compare to non VR. Technically Speaking.
Testing for this lens may could have been better to review it tracking speed and lock onto subject ablilty and low light shooting. How well the VR is handling.
All done with tripod be good.
Jeanie, Are u watching this ..
You got alot of work to do liao
Testing for this lens may could have been better to review it tracking speed and lock onto subject ablilty and low light shooting. How well the VR is handling.
All done with tripod be good.
Jeanie, Are u watching this ..
You got alot of work to do liao
it harder to do shoot in controlled lighting for such a lens..VR lens arent that sharper for any aperature compare to non VR. Technically Speaking.
Testing for this lens may could have been better to review it tracking speed and lock onto subject ablilty and low light shooting. How well the VR is handling.
All done with tripod be good.
Jeanie, Are u watching this ..
You got alot of work to do liao
sorry.i'm not obligated to do these 'tests'.
i'm sure in the entire CS forum, i'm not the only one who has this lens and not the appropriate person to even comment on this lens in a 'technical' way.
search wise, i've already said.no limit button.hence hunts alot.quite irritating.:angry:
TCII are onli for AFS Lens of a constant aperature . Not for this lens
Allows 1.7 x of extension but at loss of 1/2 stop of light.
- Status