A99


heh. Most of the time i see Rash bro supporting Sony stuff and this is probably the first time i see him saying D800/D4 is good and nothing much about this A99. Seems like the A99 isnt really up to standard huh?

Hmmm... No actually, I favor the truth. I'll emphasize the right tools for the job, and getting value for money. You'd be amazed with how many systems I shoot. :)
 

Good to hear that no biased comments from you. Since this A99 dont seems to work for me (as of now..) i shall continue to to wait and make do with my NEX first. Since I dont have the luxury to shoot with so many system like you and many others. :bsmilie:. Now just looking forward for Sony to uses the D800 or better sensor on their next possible camera.

You're not going to jump ship already right? :bsmilie:
 

You're not going to jump ship already right? :bsmilie:

Waiting for official reviews with controlled comparisons. But the D4 is on my shortlist.

The A99 is fantastic for video, but I heck care about video. I wanted improvements in FPS and buffer depth. Looks like they gave us the same tiny buffer as the A77.
 

Last edited:
Yeah, but apparently the people who ran the tests are incompetent LOL. Lots of motion blur.

wont be surprise someone will blame it to steady shot lolz it's not good enough
 

Boss, can you just post the link instead of embedding the images in the IMG file? Takes darn long to load the page now....
 

Boss, can you just post the link instead of embedding the images in the IMG file? Takes darn long to load the page now....
Haha, yeah it takes ages. ^^
 

Boss, can you just post the link instead of embedding the images in the IMG file? Takes darn long to load the page now....

How's that? :P

The high ISO shots are not bad :-) even 25600
 

The samples look like others I've seen... Baaaaaad ISO noise, with the "hatching" pattern seen on the A77 and compact cameras. I expected a lot more from them after all these years and the excellent 16MP sensor.
 

Haha, yeah it takes ages. ^^



what you guys ISP using? mine loads like normal :P (just kidding) hyperlink the photos for those having slow links :P (just kidding again)
 

The samples look like others I've seen... Baaaaaad ISO noise, with the "hatching" pattern seen on the A77 and compact cameras. I expected a lot more from them after all these years and the excellent 16MP sensor.

I have not pixel peep just look at the normal view A77 is lot worst than this bro ;-)
 

The samples look like others I've seen... Baaaaaad ISO noise, with the "hatching" pattern seen on the A77 and compact cameras. I expected a lot more from them after all these years and the excellent 16MP sensor.
And I was just going to order it. >.<
 

I have not pixel peep just look at the normal view A77 is lot worst than this bro ;-)

Yes, but it's the noise pattern that worries me. The A99 noise pattern is the type that is difficult to clean without destroying details.
 

Well. So meaning to say. Even a NEX5n performs better in low light?
Thats really embarrassing.. :confused:
 

Last edited:
Back
Top