Cool down bro, since the annoucement is on 22 April. Let's wait for it. Maybe there is a light within darkness. I had done a goggle search. The whole world is talking about it. Oooooh, one month left. :bsmilie:
well... i did asked about the specs for this 5Dmk2, and well..... i've settled for one 5D and i am happy with it.
this rumoured specs seems to be killing off the 1Dsmk3. so i believe certain functions would not be made available to the replacement.
after a few weeks shooting with 5D, i must say.... its a great camera.... and i still stand by my words as why would there always be a need for the latest, greatest, fastest, biggest ?
why ??
because current equipment cannot fulfill your needs or just a way to show off you have the latest and greatest ??
i've seen many photographers with great shots shooting with a 20D, and still beats some novice using a 1Dmk3.
i would again take this with a pinch of salt really...
but seriously.....
LOL! Canon must have been stuck in rut to release the successor to the 5D. It cannot have too little features to boot because I am sure shooters will expect more from the previous model. And it also cannot have too many features or else it makes the 1Ds Mark III looks like an expensive brick. I am sure shooters are not dumb enough to fall into the megapixel race (I hope!). It is defintely not going to be built like the 1-series but slightly better than XXD series.
The pie must have been really thin to begin with when they segmented this particular niche market. I am chuckling as I type this.
Kudos to Nikon for bringing in real 'upgrades' to the market. To more good years ahead!
yes why worry abt the technology chase. The specs for mk2 (if it's true) doesnt seems too spectacular, wondering if I really need the upgrade :bigeyes:Think I'll just buy a 5D in April when prices freefall.
3499USD is just too much for me. This product seems to be targeted at the D3.
Anyway, I believe Canon will be releasing another FF cam, probably an adv. enthusiast level. But don't quote me.
well... i did asked about the specs for this 5Dmk2, and well..... i've settled for one 5D and i am happy with it.
this rumoured specs seems to be killing off the 1Dsmk3. so i believe certain functions would not be made available to the replacement.
after a few weeks shooting with 5D, i must say.... its a great camera.... and i still stand by my words as why would there always be a need for the latest, greatest, fastest, biggest ?
why ??
because current equipment cannot fulfill your needs or just a way to show off you have the latest and greatest ??
i've seen many photographers with great shots shooting with a 20D, and still beats some novice using a 1Dmk3.
i would again take this with a pinch of salt really...
but seriously.....
The market segment is not in direct competition with the D300. Just as the 5D created a new class of camera 3 years ago, the new 5D will create a similar new niche above the D300, but below the current Canon flagship. It will remain the affordable, full-frame niche that Nikon chose not to produce. The new Canon flagship, this Fall, will have a "1.5:1 price/performance advantage to the Nikon flagship." (Read carefully: this statement refers to the coming Canon flagship, not the 5D II being discussed here).
You can't really put it that way. It sounds like you're justifying your purchase of the 5D?
It's the reality of life. Products are upgraded to be better, and human nature makes us have the strong tendency to drool over better technology at cheaper prices than b4.
IMHO, it's got nothing to do, and pretty much irrelevant to whether a person with lower end camera can take better pictures than someone with a more expensive one. I think we've heard enough of that. To me, it's a pretty lame argument. (No offence! Lest you get the wrong idea that I'm attacking you. Not directing this specifically at you based on your previous post. But something I feel has been blown out of context in general.)
If we want to go on and on about it, I could also say an experienced person with an eye for composition can take better pics on a pinhole camera than an uninterested novice with a 1Ds MkIII cam. But that's a really lame comparison.
Whether an upgrade is worth it or not really boils down to the individual. Nothing much to do with skill level IMHO. If it is really so, I would have stuck to my D60 cam of 6MP. Why upgrade to whatever 20D, 30D or 40D? I won't kid myself to say it's only about skills. There's a lot that newer technology can do for us and that, like I say, our human nature yearns for.
So bottom line is, if you really like new stuffs, and you can afford it, get it! It's a material world. Otherwise, we should just be happy (or at least try to make yourself happy) with whatever equipment we have at hand.
nice price but expensive for me, have to settle for 5D.:bsmilie:- MSRP USD3499
My impression of 5D is an prosumer FF cam. This new toy is like a 1DsIII-Jr.
Two digic III? I only need one if it will reduce the price. 6FPS? I only need 3-4. Liveview? only if it wont cost me more. CXR NR? sounds great I'll take the version2 of this processor when its refined.
Or the center can have 2 crosses. :bsmilie:
But a good catch though... after all those web rumors that failed to materialize, I am beginning to handle current rumors with a pinch of salt.
June 2, :think:....
Maybe got chance...
I will be BACK!![]()
Rumored Specs and Details article
http://gizmodo.com/367086/canon-5d-mark-ii-rumored-specs-and-details