Why not 24-85 vr? Optics are good and range is v usable. U can spend remainder on 70-300 vr. Optics wise prob better than 28-300
Another one to consider is the 24-120vr. Cost a little more though.
Why not 24-85 vr? Optics are good and range is v usable. U can spend remainder on 70-300 vr. Optics wise prob better than 28-300
nikoneer said:How about d600 and 28mm f1.8?
rain5533 said:Prefect match... Go ahead.
nikoneer said:Serious? Never handled fx before...
ecurbw said:If I use d600 on my dx format sigma 10-20mm, is it really bad?
Another one to consider is the 24-120vr. Cost a little more though.
unchecked said:Or I can get the 24-85vr kit and 85 1.8 first and then a sigma 70-200mm 2.8 when the year end bonus kicks in.
rain5533 said:Zoom kit Lens in DSLR cannot is without it all the way.
Blur Shadow said:I totally didn't get that.
ageha said:That's bs, you know that! A Nikon can shoot beautiful compositions with great lighting automatically, that's common sense.
WTH that's bs! Not only can it shoot beautiful compositions with great lighting, it can also automatically focus before you even press the shutter. Please tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. A half truth like this isn't helping anyone!
noinimod said:Its funny when sarcasm doesn't translate well in text sometimes
TERENCESPOT said:Just to share, canon also come out with a 6D.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/17/canon-eos-6d-dslr/