Xiaxue blogs about Clubsnap

[zaren]

blogger is smart enough to cover the eyes of mentioned subject, but below, photographer face can been seen .. ,maybe she forget to censor it too.

blogger knows abit of the law and is very careful in certain aspects... but again photos used were not authorised by photographers..

the photographer below is not the target of her scorn, but the portly gentleman at the left of the photo is. notice that she has drawn in an ejaculating dick beneath the gentleman's left hand, with the words "wankers!!!" next to him. if this is not defamation, i don't know what is.

:thumbsd:

 

[joshiii]

Guys & Gals... Cool.... Just shoot whatever you like...:thumbsup:
Be it girls, guys, uncles or aunties in lingerie or bikini...:sweat:
Dun be brought down to as low as whoever blogs...:thumbsd:
I think that fella is just plain jealous nobody is shooting at her.:bsmilie:
Go ahead... do whatever you like...
Happy can liao!!!

 

[sprintist]

I think paying to shoot an attractive subject is an excellent way of learning
I think not paying to shoot an attractive subject is an even more excellent way of learning

Let's face it, grandmas and friends are ugly.

but my in many ways, my grandma is more beautiful than xiaxue

 

[zaren]

but my in many ways, my grandma is more beautiful than xiaxue

my toy poodle is way cuter than xiaxue too.

 

[raincool2005]

the photographer below is not the target of her scorn, but the portly gentleman at the left of the photo is. notice that she has drawn in an ejaculating dick beneath the gentleman's left hand, with the words "wankers!!!" next to him. if this is not defamation, i don't know what is.

:thumbsd:

i think it is enough to form a case against blogger, if u see her blog, so many photos were used to publish without permission of photographers, maybe under this COPYRIGHT ACT IN ORIGINAL LITERARY, DRAMATIC, MUSICAL AND ARTISTIC WORKS.

 

[lancey]

I think paying to shoot an attractive subject is an excellent way of learning
I think not paying to shoot an attractive subject is an even more excellent way of learning

Let's face it, grandmas and friends are ugly.

Not my grandma. But really again, u r free to think what u will

 

[HeiPiGu]

The best solution and the most noble way Xiaxue can help to put an end to perverted guys shooting xmm in car shows is to SHOW UP in these events!!

Her very presence is enough to make all hot blooded GWC to suffer shrinkage so torturous that they'll never look at a pig the same way again :devil:

Save the world Xiaxue, come to these car shows, save the xmm by showing your face. Punish these perverts please, they have to see your face.

 

[sprintist]

my toy poodle is way cuter than xiaxue too.

so is you and my face combined in a 'twist' pose camwhored style :bsmilie:

 

[nottipiglet]

I think paying to shoot an attractive subject is an excellent way of learning
I think not paying to shoot an attractive subject is an even more excellent way of learning

Let's face it, grandmas and friends are ugly.

My grandma has passed on... but she was not ugly. She was a beautiful and kind person and it shows on her face, even in old age. :cry:

 

[lancey]

the photographer below is not the target of her scorn, but the portly gentleman at the left of the photo is. notice that she has drawn in an ejaculating dick beneath the gentleman's left hand, with the words "wankers!!!" next to him. if this is not defamation, i don't know what is.

:thumbsd:

the "dick" looks out of proportion and only 4 drops?? the defence lawyer will argue.

 

[HeiPiGu]

my toy poodle is way cuter than xiaxue too.

Don't insult toy poodles leh, I also got a toy poodle too. It's cruel to compare the poodles to her...I mean cruel for the poodles

 

[zaren]

so is you and my face combined in a 'twist' pose camwhored style :bsmilie:

*shudder*

:bsmilie:

 

[hongwen37]

hey people, she used some photos from cs on her blog ? is she allowed by law to use other people's photos ? her blog earns money right ? did she break the copyright law ?

let me guess the intention :

- blogger posted such a topic on her blog (news about sex indirectly)

- get notice on clubsnap (very hot website)

- media gets notice of it and advertise it on papers

- hit rate of blog goes up after papers published it

- advertising on her blog can collect fees etc...

BUT...

blogger forget those photos used are property of some photographers.. it just take someone who knows the copyright law, got fed up with pictures being used without permission, and blow this matter into a legal suit case ... the ball is now in photographers' court, not blogger's

:sweat:

No.. I dont think she infringes on the Copyright Act..
Refer to http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/ Copyright Act Section 36..

"Fair dealing for purpose of criticism or review
36. A fair dealing with a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, or with an adaptation of a literary, dramatic or musical work, shall not constitute an infringement of the copyright in the work if it is for the purpose of criticism or review, whether of that work or of another work, and a sufficient acknowledgment of the work is made. "

She acknowledges the photographers and critise / reviews the photos...

I think she is not stupid.. She must have read up on the Copyright Act or have someone advised her before she even think of blogging about all those stuff...

 

[zaren]

the "dick" looks out of proportion and only 4 drops?? the defence lawyer will argue.

she can afford a better defence lawyer than that lah. one that argues for her unblemished blogging record, her restrained use of expletives, and her love for dawn yang. that should get her off any hook.

 

[raincool2005]

The best solution and the most noble way Xiaxue can help to put an end to perverted guys shooting xmm in car shows is to SHOW UP in these events!!

Her very presence is enough to make all hot blooded GWC to suffer shrinkage so torturous that they'll never look at a pig the same way again :devil:

Save the world Xiaxue, come to these car shows, save the xmm by showing your face. Punish these perverts please, they have to see your face.

she should stand on the stage, intro herself and HER BLOG. I am sure many want to ask where she got all those photos ? :devil:

 

[cheryl852]

You're free to start a thread about Miss Piggy and post her blog link, and we're free to make any comments we want about her.

Not happy, delete this thread. If not, free speech.

sure. but please be more creative and express your hatred in other forms beside "dont click on her link". (which was the typical response i saw at the first page) damn unoriginal. unless your creative juices are not flowing, i understand why u have to make the above statement.

 

[raincool2005]

No.. I dont think she infringes on the Copyright Act..
Refer to http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/ Copyright Act Section 36..

"Fair dealing for purpose of criticism or review
36. A fair dealing with a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, or with an adaptation of a literary, dramatic or musical work, shall not constitute an infringement of the copyright in the work if it is for the purpose of criticism or review, whether of that work or of another work, and a sufficient acknowledgment of the work is made. "

She acknowledges the photographers and critise / reviews the photos...

I think she is not stupid.. She must have read up on the Copyright Act or have someone advised her before she even think of blogging about all those stuff...

ok, how abt those photos she used on her blog ? can the photographers form a case on the issue of works published without permission ?

 

[HeiPiGu]

sure. but please be more creative and express your hatred in other forms beside "dont click on her link". (which was the typical response i saw at the first page) damn unoriginal. unless your creative juices are not flowing, i understand why u have to make the above statement.

Show hatred or resentment also must have creativity one meh?? Siao lah :bsmilie: :bsmilie:

 

[cheryl852]

Show hatred or resentment also must have creativity one meh?? Siao lah :bsmilie: :bsmilie:

got pple complain boring, same topic keep bringing up.
so i think show hatred also be more creative ba..

imagine the whole thread being "please do not click on her blog"
damn boring :bsmilie:

 

[cheryl852]

No.. I dont think she infringes on the Copyright Act..
Refer to http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/ Copyright Act Section 36..

"Fair dealing for purpose of criticism or review
36. A fair dealing with a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, or with an adaptation of a literary, dramatic or musical work, shall not constitute an infringement of the copyright in the work if it is for the purpose of criticism or review, whether of that work or of another work, and a sufficient acknowledgment of the work is made. "

She acknowledges the photographers and critise / reviews the photos...

I think she is not stupid.. She must have read up on the Copyright Act or have someone advised her before she even think of blogging about all those stuff...

but she usually always "almost get sued one". like her defaming dawn yang :think:
wonder if the photographer had confronted her already anot.. shld be quite entertaining.